|
Enco Precast Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
|
[2022] QCA 94
|
Supreme Court of Queensland - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Queensland
|
27 May 2022
|
AustLII
|
|
 7
|
|
Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of the City of Gold Coast
|
[2021] QIRC 361
|
Queensland Industrial Relations Commission
|
Australia - Queensland
|
27 Oct 2021
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Enco Precast Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
|
[2021] ICQ 15
|
Industrial Court of Queensland
|
Australia - Queensland
|
20 Aug 2021
|
AustLII
|
|
4
|
|
Enco Precast Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
|
[2020] QIRC 188
|
Queensland Industrial Relations Commission
|
Australia - Queensland
|
30 Oct 2020
|
AustLII
|
|
11 
|
|
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BMD Constructions Pty Ltd
|
[2013] FCA 41
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
1 Feb 2013
|
AustLII
|
|
3
|
|
Giacci Bros Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Mining & Energy Division)
|
[2012] FCA 1525
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
24 Oct 2012
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Marshall v Averay
|
[2006] QDC 356; (2007) 27 Qld Lawyer Reps 313; [2007] QPLR 137
|
District Court of Queensland
|
Australia - Queensland
|
29 Sep 2006
|
AustLII
|
|
13
|
|
CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union - re Appeals against refusals to find industrial dispute; jurisdiction; whether classes of employment subject to dispute within eligibility coverage of CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union, (CPSU); construction of eligibility rule; leave to appeal allowed; meaning of expression 'part of a business, whose principal function is incidental, ancillary or complementary to the supply of telecommunication services'; whether activities of employers properly characterised as being within that industry description; principles of construction of union eligibility rule; manner in which rule came about is a relevant consideration in construction of rule; consideration of history of rule in perspective with use of similar words in statute and case law; use of expressions elsewhere in rules; meaning of 'business', 'part of a business' and 'principal function'; history of reference to 'part of a single business' in enterprise bargaining and transmission of business provisions in Act; consideration of reasons given by designated Presidential Member when making initial alteration and reasons stated for second alteration; for the purpose of the rule, 'business' connotes the organisation of work or resources by an employer, for commercial, public purpose or like activity; 'part of a business' connotes an identifiable or discrete activity within a business of the kind described; the expression 'whose principal function' denotes a requirement that, from the whole or substantial portion of the relevant business or organisation of work, the effective outcome be activity of the relevant description; the organisation of work by EDS pursuant to a contract for services to support systems used by Telstra and the organisation of work by it within a particular organisational unit within the CPSUs eligibility coverage; so is the organisation of work by IBM GSA pursuant to a contract for services to Telstra; each appeal allowed; finding of dispute made on determination of each appeal - PR939419
|
|
Australian Industrial Relations Commission
|
Australia
|
17 Oct 2003
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Begovic v WCC
|
[2002] SAWCT 115
|
South Australian Workers Compensation Tribunal
|
Australia - South Australia
|
20 Nov 2002
|
AustLII
|
|
3
|
|
Public Service Association v The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers
|
[2002] SAIRC 49
|
South Australian Industrial Relations Court
|
Australia - South Australia
|
18 Nov 2002
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Medical Scientists (SA Public Sector) Award
|
[2001] SAIRComm 47
|
South Australian Industrial Relations Commission
|
Australia - South Australia
|
22 Oct 2001
|
AustLII
|
|
4
|
|
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v CSR Ltd t/as CSR Humes
|
[2000] FCA 1203
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
28 Aug 2000
|
AustLII
|
|
17
|
