Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Cuming versus Sibley 4

[1769] EngR 7; 98 ER 305; (1769) 4 Burr 2489

King's Bench

United Kingdom

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
United States v Wright	489 F2d 1181; 160 USApp DC 57	United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit	United States - District of Columbia	27 Dec 1973	WorldLII		33
Forbes v Samuel	[1913] UKLawRpKQB 104; [1913] 3 KB 706		United Kingdom	6 Jun 1913	CommonLII		54
Holford and Wife v The Melbourne Tramway and Omnibus Co Ltd	[1907] ArgusLawRp 139; 13 ALR 667; 29 ALT 112	Argus Law Reports	Australia	14 Oct 1907	AustLII		10
Pollitt v James Forrest and Three Others, and Walsh	[1847] EngR 31; (1847) 11 QB 962; 116 ER 732		United Kingdom	circa 1847	CommonLII		1

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Sedgwicke Qui tam, &c v Richardson	[1797] EngR 243; 3 Lev 374; 83 ER 737	King's Bench	United Kingdom	circa 1797	CommonLII		8
Rex versus Berney Brograve, Esq	[1769] EngR 13; 4 Burr 2491; 98 ER 306	King's Bench	United Kingdom	circa 1769	CommonLII		8
9 Vin 5821	9 VIN 5821		Australia - Victoria				2

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback