Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Cotterill and Wife v Starkey 3

[1839] EngR 55; 173 ER 676; (1839) 8 C & P 691

United Kingdom

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
In Re Brockelbank, Ex parte Dunn & Raeburn	[1889] UKLawRpKQB 72; 23 QBD 17	Queen's Bench	United Kingdom	4 May 1889	CommonLII		6
Bates v Brett	[1897] NSWLawRp 77; 18 LR (NSW) 267; 14 WN (NSW) 47	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	25 Aug 1897	AustLII

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
"How the Romans Did for Us: Ancient Roots of the Tort of Negligence"	(2003) 26 University of New South Wales Law Journal 475	Ibbetson, David	Australia	circa 2003	AustLII		1

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
8 C & P 881	8 C & P 881						3
"How the Romans Did for Us: Ancient Roots of the Tort of Negligence"	(2003) 26 University of New South Wales Law Journal 475	Ibbetson, David	Australia	circa 2003	AustLII		1
8 Car 0	8 CAR 0		Australia - Commonwealth	circa 2003			1
Bates v Brett	[1897] NSWLawRp 77; 18 LR (NSW) 267; 14 WN (NSW) 47	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	25 Aug 1897	AustLII

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback