Directors, &c, of the Imperial Gas Light and Coke Co Appellants; Samuel Broadbent,-Respondent 20

[1859] EngR 915; 11 ER 239; (1859) 7 HLCas 600

House of Lords

United Kingdom

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s) †	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text	Citation Index
Smethurst v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police	[2020] HCA 14; (2020) 272 CLR 177; (2020) 376 ALR 575; (2020) 94 ALJR 502; 280 A Crim R 356	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	15 Apr 2020	AustLII	94
Lethe Estate Ltd and Great River Rafting and Plantation Tour Ltd v Jamaica Public Service Co Ltd	[2018] JMSC 31	Supreme Court of Jamaica	Jamaica	23 Feb 2018	CommonLII
Hall v Environment Agency	[2017] EWHC 1309 (TCC)	High Court of England and Wales	United Kingdom - England and Wales	31 May 2017	BAILII	2
Mincom Ltd v Oniqua Pty Ltd	[2006] QSC 155	Supreme Court of Queensland	Australia - Queensland	26 Jun 2006	AustLII
Wildtree Hotels Ltd v London Borough of Harrow	[2000] UKHL 70; [2001] 2 AC 1; [2000] 3 All ER 289; [2000] 3 WLR 165; [2000] 2 EGLR 5; (2001) 81 P & CR 9	House of Lords	United Kingdom	22 Jun 2000	BAILII	38
Europe Strength Food Co Pty Ltd v AB Consolidated Ltd SC Christchurch A84/77	[1978] NZHC 204	High Court of New Zealand	New Zealand	6 Mar 1978	NZLII
K vP Co v McKie	[1949] SCR 698	Supreme Court of Canada	Canada	4 Oct 1949	Supreme Court of Canada	5
Dunstan v King	[1948] ArgusLawRp 8; (1948) 55 ALR 320	Argus Law Reports	Australia	11 Mar 1948	AustLII
Richardson v Browning	(1936) 31 Tas LR 78		Australia - Tasmania	28 Feb 1936	AustLII	5
R v Macfarlane; Ex parte O'Flanagan and O'Kelly	[1923] HCA 39; (1923) 32 CLR 518; 29 ALR 353	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	23 Aug 1923	AustLII	175
Strelitz Bros v Britnall	[1912] WALawRp 56; (1912) 15 WALR 12		Australia - Western Australia	23 Dec 1912	AustLII	1
Piggott v Middlesex County Council	[1908] UKLawRpCh 105; [1909] 1 Ch 134	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	24 Jul 1908	CommonLII	4
Behrens v Richards	[1905] UKLawRpCh 100; [1905] 2 Ch 614; 21 TLR 705	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	1 Aug 1905	CommonLII	13
Cowper v Laidler	[1903] UKLawRpCh 96; [1903] 2 Ch 337	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	19 May 1903	CommonLII	8
Honourable Robert Jones,-Appellant; The Stanstead, Shefford, and Chambly Railroad Co-Respondents	[1872] EngR 2; 17 ER 329; (1872) 8 Moore PCCNS 310	Privy Council	United Kingdom	circa 1872	CommonLII
John Rylands and Jehu Horrocks v Thomas Fletcher	[1868] UKLawRpHL 16; (1868) LR 3 HL 330		United Kingdom	17 Jul 1868	CommonLII
Baxendale v Me Murray	[1867] UKLawRpCh 80; (1866-1867) LR 2 LRCh App 790		United Kingdom	31 Jul 1867	CommonLII	4
Attorney-General v Proprietors of the Bradford Canal	[1866] UKLawRpEq 70; 2 Eq 71		United Kingdom	16 Mar 1866	CommonLII	9
George Elliot,-Appellant; The Directors, etc, of the North Eastern Railway Co,-Respondents	[1863] EngR 443; 10 HLCas 333; 11 ER 1055; 32 LJHL 402	House of Lords	United Kingdom	circa 1863	CommonLII	16

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title	Citation(s) †	Author	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
"Varieties of Damages for Breach of Privacy"	[2018] UMelbLRS 7	Varuhas, JNE	Australia	circa 2018	AustLII

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s) †	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text	Citation Index
(1868) LR 6 Eq 299	(1868) LR 6 Eq 299		United Kingdom	circa 1868		2
Coe v Wise	1868 LR 1 QB 7213		United Kingdom		LexisNexis / Westlaw	2
Baxendale v Me Murray	[1867] UKLawRpCh 80; (1866-1867) LR 2 LRCh App 790		United Kingdom	31 Jul 1867	CommonLII	4
Attorney-General v Proprietors of the Bradford Canal	[1866] UKLawRpEq 70; 2 Eq 71		United Kingdom	16 Mar 1866	CommonLII	9
George Elliot,-Appellant; The Directors, etc, of the North Eastern Railway Co,-Respondents	[1863] EngR 443; 10 HLCas 333; 11 ER 1055; 32 LJHL 402	House of Lords	United Kingdom	circa 1863	CommonLII	16
Lord Kensington "be decree of the Lord's Justices must, & herefore,be reversed, and that of the Xaster of the Rollsbe affirmed The Attorney General -Will your Lordships forgive me for suggesting the form of the order Discharge the order of the Lords Justices, and declare that the Kensington estate i s not chargeable in favour of the mortgagee8 or the representat~Tes of the late Lord Kensington with the difference bettreen the amount of the rents and prokits of the estate and the interest of the sum of ~ 2 0 , O Oreceived aad accrued due ~ respectively during the life of the late Lord Kensington And with this declaration remit the cause to the Itolls Court This is [600] necessary, because there was no formal decision at the Rolls, but the case, after his Honor had declared his approval of the clerk's certificate, was carried by arrangement to the Lords Justices Order appealed from d~schar~ed,and cause remitted with a declarationLords' Journals, 25 July 1859 The DIRECTORS, & e , of the IMPEEKAL GAS LIGHT and COKE COMPAN3$ Appellants; SAMUELBROADB~~T,-IZespon~ent[Aug 4,5, 18591 [Mews' Dig i 723; vii 551, 1551, 1587; viii 1508, 1515, 1578, 1580; x	191 SC 29		United Kingdom - Scotland			2

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback