Gilbert v the Corpn of Trinity House
|
[1886] UKLawRpKQB 106; (1886) 17 QBD 795
|
|
United Kingdom
|
24 Jun 1886
|
CommonLII
|
|
30
|
Co of Proprietors of the Lancaster Canal Co v Parnaby
|
[1839] EngR 312; 11 A & E 223; 113 ER 400
|
Queen's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1839
|
CommonLII
|
|
25
|
Gray and Wife v Pullen and Hubble
|
[1864] EngR 816; 5 B & S 970; 122 ER 1091; 34 LJQB 265
|
Kings Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1864
|
CommonLII
|
|
22
|
Bourke v Davis
|
[1889] UKLawRpCh 180; (1890) 44 Ch D 110; 38 WR 167; 62 LT 34
|
|
United Kingdom
|
3 Dec 1889
|
CommonLII
|
|
21
|
Penny v Wimbledon Urban District Council
|
[1899] UKLawRpKQB 102; [1899] 2 QB 72
|
|
United Kingdom
|
6 May 1899
|
CommonLII
|
|
19
|
David Daniel v The Directors, & c, of the Metropolitan Railway Co
|
[1871] UKLawRpHL 3; (1871) LR 5 HL 45
|
|
United Kingdom
|
9 Mar 1871
|
CommonLII
|
|
18
|
Borough of Bathurst v Macpherson
|
(1879) 4 AC 256
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1879
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
17
|
Huffer v Allen
|
[1866] UKLawRpExch 54; LR 2 Exch 15; 36 LJEx 17
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
14 Nov 1866
|
CommonLII
|
|
17
|
Mayor and Burgesses of Lyme Regis against-Henley, Esquire
|
[1832] EngR 296; 3 B & Ad 77; 110 ER 29
|
Kings Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1832
|
CommonLII
|
|
13
|
Steel v The South-Eastern Railway Co
|
[1855] EngR 475; 16 CB 550; 139 ER 875
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1855
|
CommonLII
|
|
11
|
Overton v Freeman
|
[1852] EngR 106; 11 CB 867; 138 ER 717; 21 LJCP 52
|
Court of Common Pleas
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1852
|
CommonLII
|
|
7
|
Harris and Wife v Baker
|
[1815] EngR 626; 105 ER 745; (1815) 4 M & S 27
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1815
|
CommonLII
|
|
6
|
2 P 274
|
2 P 274
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
2 P 266
|
2 P 266
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Attorney-General v Lewes Corporation
|
[1911] UKLawRpCh 95; (1911) 2 Ch 495
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
31 Jul 1911
|
CommonLII
|
|
4
|
Mayor, & , of Wednesbury v Lodge Holes Colliery Co
|
[1905] UKLawRpKQB 115; [1905] 2 KB 823
|
|
United Kingdom
|
6 Jun 1905
|
CommonLII
|
|
4
|
[1918] Mad 212
|
[1918] Mad 212
|
|
India
|
circa 1918
|
|
|
3
|
Secretary of State v a Cockcraft
|
[1914] AllINRprMad 474; [1915] MWN 39; 39 Mad 351; [1915] AIR Mad 993
|
All India Reporter - Madras
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
2 Dec 1914
|
AsianLII
|
|
3
|
Foreman v Mayor of Canterbury
|
(1871) LR 6 QB 214
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1871
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
3
|
(1909) 38 Bom 116
|
(1909) 38 Bom 116
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1909
|
|
|
2
|
(1907) 33 Bom 393
|
(1907) 33 Bom 393
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1907
|
|
|
2
|
38 Cal 797
|
38 Cal 797
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1915
|
|
|
2
|
(1916) 39 Mad 351-27
|
(1916) 39 Mad 351-27
|
|
India
|
circa 1916
|
|
|
1
|
Hartley v Rochdale Corpn
|
[1908] UKLawRpKQB 91; (1908) 2 KB 594
|
|
United Kingdom
|
23 May 1908
|
CommonLII
|
|
1
|
(1896) 1 QB 385
|
(1896) 1 QB 385
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1896
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
1
|
(1888) 11 Mad 343
|
(1888) 11 Mad 343
|
|
India
|
circa 1888
|
|
|
1
|
(1887) 11 Bom 329
|
(1887) 11 Bom 329
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1887
|
|
|
1
|
(1884) 10 Cal 445
|
(1884) 10 Cal 445
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1884
|
|
|
1
|
(1872) 8 BLR 265
|
(1872) 8 BLR 265
|
|
|
circa 1872
|
|
|
1
|
34 AC 524
|
34 AC 524
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
1
|
Ivaturi Veera Subramanyam v President, District Board, Narasapur
|
[1940] AllINRprMad 366; [1941] AIR Mad 733
|
All India Reporter - Madras
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
5 Apr 1940
|
AsianLII
|
|
|