|
[1924] Bom 353
|
[1924] Bom 353
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1924
|
|
|
 1
|
|
Matubai "is case is that plaintiff should continue to not entitled to a disproportionate pay occupy the accommodation in the family ment out of joint family funds because dwelling now occupied by her should she has suffered occasionaly from fits she wish to do so of hysteria If hysteria were made a A good deal of argument was ad ground for increasing maintenance, dressed to the Court on the offer of widows would be tempted in ever in Shivji to pay Rs 60 a month for the creasing numbers to cease exercising accommodation occupied by the defen control over themselves I believe the dant, but defendant in my opinion was evidence of plaintiff and Shivji that she fully justified in not accepting Shivji as has no money and only a few bangles a tenant in view of Shivji's financial by way of ornaments circumstances With regard to the Taking all the circumstances into second point, viz : maintenance, ac consideration, I am of opinion that cording to the defendant the income plaintiff is entitled to maintenance at received from the family property am the rate of Rs 48 a month while ounts to Rs 188 and the expenditure plaintiff elects to live in the family to Rs 83-7-0 or thereabouts, leaving - dwelling house where she may continue a balance of Rs 104-9-0 (After dis to occupy the rooms now in her oc cussing the several items of income cupation Should plaintiff however elect and expenditure, the judgment pro to live separately, except on grounds ceeded) As regards the so-called Syce's of immmorality, she should be paid room the strong point urged on behalf Rs 60 as separate maintenance in of the plaintiff is that the arbitrator in cluding residence charges Plaintiff's his award estimated the rent of the maintenance to be a charge on the 13
|
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1924
|
|
|
|
