LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

King Emperor v Syed Khan    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
4 Ir 1925	4 IR 1925			circa 1925			1
High ' Magistrate dismissed the complaint for Courts are not at one on the matter, but want of sanction as required by S 195 (l) that authority dealt only with a case ( &) The District Magistrate, however, falling under S 195 (l) (c) while holding that that order was correct It is further urged before us by learned as regards the original complainant, counsel for the petitioners that that pre ordered the Magistrate to proceed with cedent is in no way wrong This being the complaint in respect of the remaining so, two points only arise It is urged five They, therefore, moved this Court that the sanction granted by our brothef in revision to set aside the order of the Heald was wrong, or without jurisdiction, District Magistrate That application because he included, in the alternative, , came before our brother Heald and, in the S 120-B We do not consider it course of his order, he came to the conclu necessary to deal with the point at sion that a prima facie case existed, and any length Even if the reference to that, while it was correct that this prose S 120-B is struck out, our learned bro cution could not proceed in the absence ther had jurisdiction to lay a complaint,1 of a complaint, he was of opinion that it was necessary, for the ends of justice, that the accused should be* proceeded against, aiid he thereupon passed am order ordering (1)			Myanmar	circa 1925			2