|
Kothandapani v Dhanammal (Kunhi "Raman J) v Madras 258 a to take as the date from which limitation habitation It can only amount to a promise e begins to run the date at which the last of to compensate a person who has voluntarily these creditors became aware of the transac rendered service for the promisor within the tion and it is impossible that all the creditors meaning of S 25, cl (2), Contract Act, and of the insolvent were all aware of the trans as such it is a valid contract He concedes action so long ago as 1932 In the result the that the Bombay High Court has taken a appeal must fail and is dismissed with costs different view in the cases in 25 Bom L R (Leave refused) 2522 and
|
44 Bom 5423
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1930
|
|
|
 1
|
