LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction † | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
17 Mad 76 |
|
India |
|
||||
Chettiar ' who is ejected from the property In (2), which shows that this view is right* my opinion the application is not a suit In that case it was held that an ap and the order refusing it is not a decree plication for execution against a judg Therefore I must dismiss the appeal as ment-debtor who happened to have died 1 hold it does not lie The respondents before the date of the application bona; will have their costs fide made in the belief that he was still alive, was a step in aid of execu pRS /k s Appeal dismissed tion; in other words, will furnish a starting point for limitation for fur- 1 | India - Bihar | circa 1924 |
|
||||
Air 1921 Pat 333 |
|
India - Bihar | circa 1921 |
|
|||
Air 1926 Mad 556 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1926 |
|
|||
Air 1921 Mad 402 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1921 |
|
|||
[1931] Lah 636 |
|
Pakistan | circa 1931 |
|
|||
4 Act 1 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1924 |
|
|||
2 P 695 |
|
circa 1924 |
|