High 'operation of law on the death of their father Court, that in view of the provisions of and O 21, R 16, Civil P 0 , is applicable Sec 78, Negotiable Instruments Act, since With respect, we are not able to agree with the plaintiff was neither the payee nor the the learned Judge who decided the case in holder of the promissory note in question
|
AIR 1937 Pat 6071
|
|
India - Bihar
|
circa 1937
|
|
|
2
|
B) and a i b
|
[1935] Mad 312
|
|
India
|
circa 1935
|
|
|
2
|
(1935) 22 Air Mad 312
|
(1935) 22 AIR Mad 312
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1935
|
|
|
2
|
[1935] Mad 3125
|
[1935] Mad 3125
|
|
India
|
circa 1935
|
|
|
2
|
Sewa Ram v Hoti Lai
|
(1931) 18 AIR All 108
|
|
India - Uttar Pradesh
|
circa 1931
|
|
|
2
|
(1928) 15 Air Cal 148
|
(1928) 15 AIR Cal 148
|
|
India - West Bengal
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
3
|
(1849) 3 Exch 7481
|
(1849) 3 Exch 7481
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1849
|
|
|
1
|
Wood v Waud
|
(1849) 8 Exch 748
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1849
|
|
|
2
|
55 Cal 5513
|
55 Cal 5513
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1937
|
|
|
2
|
Subba Narayana Yathiyar v Ramaswami Ayyar
|
30 Mad 88
|
|
India
|
circa 1937
|
|
|
21
|