LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
(1941) 1 Cal 490 |
|
United States - California | circa 1941 |
|
|||
(1941) 1 Cal 4906 |
|
United States - California | circa 1941 |
|
|||
Bhagat Singh Bugga v Dewan Jagbir Sawhney(AIR |
|
United States - California | circa 1941 |
|
|||
Jute Mills Co v Nirmal Kumar Jain', ILR |
|
United States - California | circa 1941 |
|
|||
[1941] Cal 434 |
|
United States - California | circa 1941 |
|
|||
Air 1941 Cal 434 |
|
India - West Bengal | circa 1941 |
|
|||
Air 1931 Cal 279 |
|
India - West Bengal | circa 1931 |
|
|||
Note "No second appeal was given with the result that after the said finding of fact '* surrender the rent became Rs 12-l3-5gds and (b) Landlord and tenant--Separate tenancies the plaintiff has claimed in this suit rent at 4 and B amalgamated--Tenant dispossessed by this rate from the year 1342 to the Asar kist landlord from portion of A--Tenant can claim of 1345 The material defences taken by the suspension of rent only of A When two plots of land forming separate tenancies defendant are two in number First of all he with separate assessment of rent are amalgamated so said that the two enhancements of rent of the as to form one tenancy in the eye of law and the parent jama of 50 bighas, namely, the enhance tenant is dispossessed by the landlord from a portion of ment to Rs l3-2-l8gds and subsequently to one of the plots, the tenant cannot claim suspension of the whole rent but only of tbe rent of the plot from Rs 16-5-igd were illegal enhancements, inas a portion of which he has been dispossessed : ( 29) 16 much as those enhancements contravened the | India - West Bengal | circa 1929 |
|
||||
196 IC 415 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1929 |
|
|||
130 IC 252 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1929 |
|
|||
Das v Haracharan Das' |
|
United States - California | circa 1929 |
|
|||
36 Cal 2333 |
|
United States - California | circa 1929 |
|
|||
36 Cal 233 |
|
United States - California |
|
||||
34 Cal 1011 |
|
United States - California | circa 1929 |
|
|||
Chand v Gopal Ram,' |
|
United States - California | circa 1929 |
|
|||
16 CWN 4s |
|
India |
|
||||
13 CWN 346 |
|
India | circa 1929 |
|
|||
11 IC 416 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
1 IC 297 |
|
United Kingdom |
|