LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction † | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
[1989] Mad 8917 |
|
India | circa 1989 |
|
|||
Air 1941 PC 128 |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1941 |
|
||
Air 1940 PC 1 |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1940 |
|
||
[1939] Mad 8917 |
|
India | circa 1939 |
|
|||
[1939] Mad 891 |
|
India | circa 1939 |
|
|||
[1939] Mad 776 |
|
India | circa 1939 |
|
|||
Air 1934 PC 235 |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1934 |
|
||
Air 1933 PC 29 |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1933 |
|
||
Air 1931 PC 79 |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1931 |
|
||
(1854-57) 6 Moore Ind App 393 |
|
India | circa 1854 |
|
|||
B] Krishnaswami v Sundarappayya, ILR |
|
India |
|
||||
11 CWN 34 |
|
India |
|
||||
16 CWN 74 |
|
India |
|
||||
18 Mad 41510 |
|
India |
|
||||
59 Mad 9425 |
|
India |
|
||||
59 Mad 942 |
|
India |
|
||||
56 Mad 433 |
|
India |
|
||||
11 Bom 55113 |
|
India - Maharashtra |
|
||||
58 Bom 6502 |
|
India - Maharashtra |
|
||||
Lalohand v Narhar |
|
India - Maharashtra |
|
||||
Air 1939 Mad 531 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1939 |
|
|||
Air 1939 Mad 538 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1939 |
|
|||
Air 1936 Mad 564 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1936 |
|
|||
Air 1933 Mad 322 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1933 |
|
|||
Air 1919 Mad 641 |
|
India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1919 |
|
|||
Batchu Ramajogaya v Vajjula Jagannadham |
[1918] AllINRprMad 249; |
All India Reporter - Madras | India - Tamil Nadu | 14 Nov 1918 | AsianLII |
|
|
[1939-1] MLJ 792 |
|
Malaysia | circa 1939 | LexisNexis |
|
||
54 MLJ 412 |
|
Malaysia | circa 1919 | LexisNexis |
|
||
5 MLJ 164 |
|
Malaysia | LexisNexis |
|
|||
64 MLJ 354 |
|
Malaysia | circa 1919 | LexisNexis |
|
||
36 MLJ 29 |
|
Malaysia | LexisNexis |
|
|||
Shannon v Bradstreet |
|
Court of Chancery | Republic of Ireland | circa 1919 |
|
||
29 SLR 74 |
|
Singapore - Singapore | circa 1919 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Pir Bakhsh v Mahomed Tahar |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1934 |
|
|||
Robert Blore, Plaintiff, and Sir Richard Sutton, Bart James West, H C Litchfield, Dame Mary Impey, and Christopher, Codrington, Defendants |
[1817] EngR 701; |
UK | United Kingdom | circa 1817 | CommonLII |
|
|
Fisher, Executrix of Toten, v Mowbray |
|
King's Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1807 |
|
||
163 IC 384 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
49 IC 872 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
189 IC 98 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
189 IC 364 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
185 IC 217 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
141 IC 209 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
142 IC 315 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
13 IC 331 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
108 IC 282 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
(1940) 1 Cal 250 |
|
United States - California | circa 1940 |
|
|||
Mr v T Rangaswami |
|
United States - California | circa 1928 |
|
|||
58 Cal 1235 |
|
United States - California | circa 1928 |
|
|||
58 Cal 12351 |
|
United States - California | circa 1928 |
|
|||
G H C Ariff v Jadu |
|
United States - California | circa 1928 |
|
|||
39 Cal 23212 |
|
United States - California | circa 1928 |
|
|||
Annamalai Chetty v Muthuswami Maniai |
|
United States - California | circa 1928 |
|
|||
Mr v T Rangaswami |
|
United States - California | circa 1928 |
|
|||
34 Cal 163 |
|
United States - California | circa 1928 |
|
|||
34 Cal 16311 |
|
United States - California | circa 1928 |
|
|||
15 CLJ 69 |
|
circa 1928 |
|