LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
Alderson v White |
[1858] EngR 189; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | circa 1858 | CommonLII |
|
|
Air 1916 PC 49 |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1916 |
|
||
47 Mad 729 |
|
India |
|
||||
2 P 309 |
|
|
|||||
[1924] PC 226 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1924 |
|
|||
82 IC 993 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
[1941] Own 760 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1941 |
|
|||
[1937] Own 1236 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1937 |
|
|||
[1925] Cal 1151 |
|
United States - California | circa 1925 |
|
|||
Sheo "A party who wishes the document to be under Oharan obtained a final decree for sale against stood as being different from what the words suggest the three brothers, for Rs 38,850-3-0 On 3lst should show that the form in which the language is October 1928, the three brothers executed a clothed does not express the real intention of the deed (ex 2) for Rs 42,000 in favour of the parties and that in substance the parties intended that there should be a transaction different from what claimant-appellant The construction of this the language imports In other words there must be deed is the point in dispute between the evidence to show that the parties intended a mortgage parties The appellant obtained mutation of l7('19) 6 | India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1919 |
|
||||
194 IC 417 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1919 |
|
|||
42 Mad 4071 |
|
India | circa 1919 |
|
|||
42 Mad 407 |
|
India |
|
||||
[1944] Own 399 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1944 |
|
|||
[1941] Own 7607 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1941 |
|
|||
[1934] Cal 454 |
|
United States - California | circa 1934 |
|
|||
Air 1930 Oudh 6 |
|
India - Uttar Pradesh | circa 1930 |
|
|||
[1924] Lah 75 |
|
Pakistan | circa 1924 |
|
|||
520- Own 12369 |
|
Canada - Ontario |
|
||||
172 IC 536 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
120 IC 817 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
90 IC 100 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
36 IC 38 |
|
United Kingdom |
|