LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Murarilal Mahabir Prasad v Shri b R Vad   flag 

[1975] INSC 203; 1976 1 SCR 689; AIR 1976 SC 313
Supreme Court of India
India
5th September, 1975

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
[1973] 1 SCR 442 [1973] 1 SCR 442 circa 1973 1
Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Bihar and Orissa v Kirpa Shankar Daya Shankar Vorah 81 ITR 763; [1971] 2 SCC 570 circa 1971 8
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Gujarat v M/S BM Kharwar [1968] INSC 190; 1969 1 SCR 651; AIR 1969 SC 812 Supreme Court of India India 13 Aug 1968 LIIofIndia flag 1
Punjab v M/S Jullunder Vegetables Syndicate [1965] INSC 233; 1966 2 SCR 457; AIR 1966 SC 1295 Supreme Court of India India 1 Nov 1965 LIIofIndia flag 3
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras v Ajax Products Ltd Through Its Liquidator [1964] INSC 224; 55 ITR 741; [1965] 1 SCR 700; AIR 1965 SC 1358 Supreme Court of India India 8 Oct 1964 LIIofIndia flag 13
Commissioner of Income-tar Bombay City v Amarchand N Shroff (1963) 48 TTR 59 Canada circa 1963 flag 1
Gursahai Saigal v Commissioner of Income-Tax, Punjab [1962] INSC 249; [1963] 3 SCR 893; 1963 3 SCR Supl 893; AIR 1963 SC 1062; (1963) 48 ITR 1 Supreme Court of India India 31 Aug 1962 LIIofIndia flag 22
A v Fernandez v Kerala [1957] INSC 29; [1957] SCR 837; AIR 1957 SC 657 Supreme Court of India India 2 Apr 1957 LIIofIndia flag 35
A v Fernandez v Kerala [1957] SCR 637 circa 1957 1
India United Mills Ltd v Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay [1954] INSC 102; [1955] 1 SCR 810; (1955) 27 ITR 20; AIR 1955 SC 79 Supreme Court of India India 28 Oct 1954 LIIofIndia flag 9
Mahairam Kamjidas's(1)case ','makes the machinery workable, utres valeat potius quam pereat" We, therefore, think that we should read sub-sec (6), according to the provision of which interest has to be calculated as provided in sub-sec (8) in a manner which makes it workable and thereby prevent the clear intention of sub-sec (8) being defeated Now, how is that best done? As we have (1) (1940) 8 ITR 442; AIR 1940 PC 124 Privy Council India circa 1940 flag
[1930] Itc 100 [1930] ITC 100 Republic of Ireland circa 1930 flag 1
Whitney v IRC [1926] AC 37; 10 Tax Cas 88; 134 LT 98; 42 TLR 58; 51 HL 10 United Kingdom circa 1926 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 104
Pryce v Monmouthshire Canal and Rly Cos (1879) 4 AC 197 United Kingdom circa 1879 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 14
704 Ad 705 704 AD 705 circa 1940 1
48 Itr 59 48 ITR 59; [1963] SC 1448 7
32 Itr 190 32 ITR 190 circa 1940 3

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback