|
Nand v State
|
[2022] FJCA 95
|
Court of Appeal of Fiji
|
Fiji
|
24 Aug 2022
|
PacLII
|
|
|
|
Turogo v State
|
[2016] FJCA 117
|
Court of Appeal of Fiji
|
Fiji
|
30 Sep 2016
|
PacLII
|
|
36 
|
|
R v Keogh (No 2)
|
[2015] SASC 180
|
Supreme Court of South Australia
|
Australia - South Australia
|
11 Nov 2015
|
AustLII
|
|
8
|
|
State v Lutuciri
|
[2010] FJMC 151
|
Magistrates Court of Fiji
|
Fiji
|
21 Apr 2010
|
PacLII
|
|
|
|
Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo - Decision Regarding the Practices Used to Prepare and Familiarise Witnesses for Giving Testimony at Trial - Trial Chamber I
|
[2007] IntCrimC 102
|
International Criminal Court
|
International
|
30 Nov 2007
|
WorldLII
|
|
|
|
[32] Therefore, at the close of the prosecution case the trial Judge is bound to give his mind to this vital issue as to whether there is evidence that the accused person committed the offence The test to be applied at this threshold is whether there is some relevant and admissible evidence in respect of each element that must be proved before the accused could be convicted of the offence alleged against him in the Information [see State v Anthony Frederick Stephens
|
|
|
Australia
|
6 Aug 1998
|
Legal Online / Westlaw
|
|
4
|
|
State v Stephens
|
[1998] FJHC 118
|
High Court of Fiji
|
Fiji
|
6 Aug 1998
|
PacLII
|
|
1
|
|
Townsend , R v
|
[1997] EWCA Crim 1118
|
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Criminal Division
|
United Kingdom - England and Wales
|
8 May 1997
|
BAILII
|
|
|
