|
Cumming v Stewart
|
[1928] SC 296
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
 1
|
|
Duke of Hamilton v Johnston
|
(1877) 14 SLR 298
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
circa 1877
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
|
Selby's Heirs v Jollie
|
[1795] Mor 13438
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1795
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cardross v Hamilton
|
[1711] Mor 1747
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
2 Jan 1711
|
BAILII
|
|
1
|
|
Reclaiming Motion by Bam TCP Atlantic Square Ltd Against British Telecommunications PLC; and Firleigh Ltd
|
[2021] ScotCS CSIH_44
|
Scottish Court of Session
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
20 Aug 2021
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Bam TCP Atlantic Square Ltd Against (First) British Telecommunications PLC (Rev 1)
|
[2020] ScotCS CSOH_57
|
Scottish Court of Session
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
29 May 2020
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
- Heritable Securities: Pre-default (Discussion Paper)
|
[2019] SLC 168
|
Scottish Law Commission
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 2019
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Matossian v Matossian
|
[2016] ScotCS CSOH_21
|
Scottish Court of Session
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
28 Jan 2016
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Gibson v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
|
[2009] ScotCS CSOH_14
|
Scottish Court of Session
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
3 Feb 2009
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Bell v Inkersall Investment Ltd
|
[2007] ScotCS CSIH_60
|
Scottish Court of Session
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
13 Jul 2007
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Advice Centre for Mortgages Ltd v McNicoll
|
[2006] ScotCS CSOH_58; [2006] SCLR 602; [2006] CSOH 58
|
Scottish Court of Session
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
6 Apr 2006
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
- Land Registration: Miscellaneous Issues
|
[2005] SLC 130
|
Scottish Law Commission
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 2005
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Rodger v Paton
|
[2004] ScotCS 135
|
Scottish Court of Session
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
8 Jun 2004
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
- Land Registration: Void and Voidable Titles
|
[2004] SLC 125
|
Scottish Law Commission
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 2004
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Optical Express (Gyle) Ltd v Marks & Spencer Pcl
|
[2000] ScotCS 35
|
Scottish Court of Session
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
8 Feb 2000
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
"attractive" remedy than it is at present, by placing it closer to other remedies for breach of a lease, for example rescission Reforming the law so as to provide that rights or liabilities which have accrued prior to the irritancy are not affected would mean that a relevant claim for damages could be made So the landlord, in that scenario, would achieve both the removal of the tenant (as with irritancy presently) and also be able to recover any debts due [271] As noted above, it is generally agreed by stakeholders that irritancy is (and should be) a remedy of last resort Our 2003 Report described the primary function of irritancy as a "compulsitor
|
[1992] SLC 191
|
Scottish Law Commission
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1992
|
BAILII
|
|
|
