Cases Referring to this Case |
Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case |
Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case |
Legislation Cited |
Cases and Articles Cited
Help
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other
than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential
and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines
of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel Naum MORGOVSKY
and Irina Morgovsky, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v CREDITORS' COLLECTION
SERVICE OF SAN FRANCISCO dba Premium Collection Service, a Corporation;
Mark Love, individually and as President of Premium Collection
Service , Defendants-Appellees
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
United States
29th November, 1993
Cases and Articles Cited
LawCite:
Privacy |
Disclaimers |
Conditions of Use |
Acknowledgements |
Feedback
25 