LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
Ketteman v Hansel Properties Ltd |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1987 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Tildesley v Harper |
[1878] UKLawRpCh 284; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 18 Nov 1878 | CommonLII |
|
|
Warner v Sampson |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1959 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Hipgrave v Case |
[1885] UKLawRpCh 46; |
United Kingdom | 11 Feb 1885 | CommonLII |
|
||
Joomun v Kissoondharry |
|
Media Review | circa 1977 |
|
|||
(1) The court is more strict in granting applications for amendment at the trial than before the trial An amendment which is substantial and raises new issues which are inconsistent with those found in a statement of claim will not be granted – Tive Hive Ors v Kam Tim |
|
Media Review | circa 1953 |
|
|||
Aluminium Industries v Government of Mauritius |
|
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | circa 1998 |
|
||
[1993] SCJ 464 |
|
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | circa 1993 |
|
||
Bronsema v Mascareigne Shipping and Trading Co Ltd |
|
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | circa 1985 |
|
||
Cie Bel Ombre v Bungaroo |
|
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | circa 1996 |
|