LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Barba v Court of Appeals |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|
|||
Almuete v Andres |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|
|||
Vda De Manalo vs Court of Appeals |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|
|||
Javelosa v Court of Appeals |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|
|||
Fige v CA |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|
|||
Oro Savings & Mortgage Bank v Court of Appeals |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|
|||
Crespo v Provincial Board of Nueva Ecija |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|
|||
138 Sec 24 |
|
United States |
|
||||
When the defendant raises the defense of ownership in his pleadings and the question of possession cannot be resolved without deciding the issue of ownership, the issue of ownership shall be resolved only to determine the issue of possession |
|
United States |
|
||||
Pangilinan v Aguilar |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|
|||
Tiu v Ca |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|
|||
Yu v De Lara |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|
|||
Dy v Kuizon |
|
Supreme Court of the Philippines | Philippines |
|