(2005) 11 JT 1
|
(2005) 11 JT 1
|
|
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
1
|
Annexure 'A' subject to the condition that the claim of the petitioner shall be considered with effect from the date persons junior to him were promoted As a matter of abundant caution, we consider it just and proper to require the respondent to examine the claim of the petitioner in terms of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Union of India v K Krishnan
|
AIR 1992 SC 1898
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
3
|
Chairman, State Bank of India & others v Golak Bihari Dehury
|
(1996) 7 SCC 63
|
|
|
circa 1996
|
|
|
1
|
Collector of Thanjavur Distt v S Rajagopalan
|
(2000) 9 SCC 145
|
|
|
circa 2000
|
|
|
4
|
SMT S R Venkataraman v Union of India & Anr
|
[1978] INSC 217; (1979) 2 SCC 491; [1979] 2 SCR 202; AIR 1979 SC 49
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
2 Nov 1978
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
35
|
Union of India v B Radhakrishna
|
(1997) 11 SCC 698
|
|
|
circa 1997
|
|
|
2
|
Union of India v K v Jankiraman
|
[1991] INSC 211; 1991 3 SCR 790; 1991 2 SCALE 423; 1991 4 SCC 109; AIR 1991 SC 2010
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
27 Aug 1991
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
175
|