LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Ltd     2

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
"After Tabcorp, for Whom Does the Bellgrove Toll? Cementing the Expectation Measure as the 'Ruling Principle' for Calculation of Contract Damages"	(2009) 33 Melbourne University Law Review 684	Bell, Matthew	Australia	circa 2009	AustLII		2
"After TABCORP, for Whom Does the BELLGROVE Tolls? Cementing the Expectation Measures as the 'Ruling Principle' for Calculation of Contract Damages"	[2009] UMelbLRS 17	Bell, Matthew	Australia	circa 2009	AustLII

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
Vines v Djordjevitch	[1955] HCA 19; (1955) 91 CLR 512; [1955] ALR 431; (1955) 29 ALJR 31	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	1 Apr 1955	AustLII		333
Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council	[1982] HCA 41; (1982) 149 CLR 672; (1982) 42 ALR 69; (1982) 56 ALJR 745; (1982) 51 LGRA 212; [1982] ANZ Conv R 530	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	28 Oct 1982	AustLII		309
Radford v De Froberville	[1978] 1 All ER 33; [1977] 1 WLR 1262		United Kingdom	circa 1978	LexisNexis		172
Bannon v R	[1995] HCA 27; (1995) 185 CLR 1; (1995) 132 ALR 87; (1995) 83 A Crim R 370; (1995) 70 ALJR 25; (1995) 19 Leg Rep C1	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	9 Nov 1995	AustLII		95
Wroth v Tyler	[1974] Ch 30; [1973] 1 All ER 897; [1973] 2 WLR 405	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	circa 1974	LexisNexis / Westlaw		89
Maori Trustee v Rogross Farms Ltd CA175/91	[1994] NZCA 472; [1994] 3 NZLR 410; (1994) 2 NZ Conv C 191,946; [1995] ANZ Conv R 631	Court of Appeal of New Zealand	New Zealand	7 Sep 1994	NZLII		33
James v Hutton and J Cook & Sons Ltd	[1950] 1 KB 9; [1949] 2 All ER 243		United Kingdom	circa 1950	LexisNexis / Westlaw		15
Rainbow Estates Ltd v Tokenhold Ltd	[1999] Ch 64	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	circa 1999	LexisNexis / Westlaw		8
Rawlings v Morgan	[1865] EngR 418; 18 CBNS 776; 141 ER 650; 34 LJCP 185	Court of Common Pleas	United Kingdom	circa 1865	CommonLII		7
Yates v Dunster	[1855] EngR 393; 156 ER 726; (1855) 11 Exch 15	Court of Exchequer	United Kingdom	circa 1855	CommonLII		7
"After Tabcorp, for Whom Does the Bellgrove Toll? Cementing the Expectation Measure as the 'Ruling Principle' for Calculation of Contract Damages"	(2009) 33 Melbourne University Law Review 684	Bell, Matthew	Australia	circa 2009	AustLII		2
Terroni   v Corsini	[1931] 1 Ch 515	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	circa 1931	LexisNexis / Westlaw		2
Whitlam v Kershaw	(1885) 16 QB 613		United Kingdom	circa 1885	LexisNexis / Westlaw		2
Inderwick v Leech	(1884) 1 TLR 484		United Kingdom	circa 1884	LexisNexis		2
Eyre v Rea	[1943] KB 567		United Kingdom	circa 1943	LexisNexis / Westlaw		1
"After TABCORP, for Whom Does the BELLGROVE Tolls? Cementing the Expectation Measures as the 'Ruling Principle' for Calculation of Contract Damages"	[2009] UMelbLRS 17	Bell, Matthew	Australia	circa 2009	AustLII