Ita No 486/2008, Ita No 487/2008 & Ita No 488 of
|
[2008] Page 1
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 2008
|
|
|
155
|
Adhunik Steels Ltd v Orissa Manganese and Minerals (P) Ltd
|
(2007) 7 SCC 125
|
|
|
circa 2007
|
|
|
9
|
(2006) 128 DLT 694
|
(2006) 128 DLT 694
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2006
|
|
|
2
|
(2006) 127 DLT 776
|
(2006) 127 DLT 776
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2006
|
|
|
2
|
Country Development & Management Services Pvt Ltd v Brookeside Resorts Pvt Ltd ] In
|
(2006) 133 DLT 153
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2006
|
|
|
2
|
(2006) 127 DLT 766
|
(2006) 127 DLT 766
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2006
|
|
|
2
|
National Highways Authority of India v China Coal Construction Group Corpn
|
AIR 2006 Delhi 134
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2006
|
|
|
4
|
(2005) 120 DLT 387
|
(2005) 120 DLT 387
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
2
|
Geep Batteries (India) Pvt Ltd v Gillette India Ltd
|
(2005) 118 DLT 591
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
2
|
RAJ, M/s Global Co v M/s National Fertilisers Ltd
|
(2005) 117 DLT 183
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
2
|
(2004) 111 DLT 816
|
(2004) 111 DLT 816
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2004
|
|
|
2
|
Firm Ashok Traders v Gurumukh Das Saluja
|
(2004) 3 SCC 155
|
|
|
circa 2004
|
|
|
15
|
Gujarat Bottling Co Ltd v Coca Cola
|
(2004) 115 DLT 219
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2004
|
|
|
2
|
Atul Ltd v Prakash Industries Ltd
|
2003 2 Raj 409
|
|
Sri Lanka
|
circa 2003
|
|
|
2
|
Bhatia International v Bulk Trading SA
|
[2002] INSC 132; (2002) 4 SCC 105
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
13 Mar 2002
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
47
|
[2001] Page 7
|
[2001] Page 7
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 2001
|
|
|
19
|
Sanrachna (India) Inc v AB Hotels Ltd
|
(2000) 87 DLT 449
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2000
|
|
|
3
|
Firm Ashok Tralers & Another v Gurmukh Das
|
AIR 1999 SC 565
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 1999
|
|
|
20
|
Air 1998 Delhi 397
|
AIR 1998 Delhi 397
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1998
|
|
|
4
|
M/S Gujarat Pottling Coltd v the Coca Cola Co
|
[1995] INSC 361; (1995) 5 SCC 545; AIR 1995 SC 2372; 1995 4 SCALE 635; (1995) 6 JT 3
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 1995
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
39
|
Mahadeo Savlaram Shelkae v Pune Municipal Corporation
|
(1995) 3 SCC 33
|
|
|
circa 1995
|
|
|
18
|
Ravi Kumar v Misha Vadhera
|
AIR 1995 Delhi 175
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1995
|
|
|
2
|
SHA " 37 For appointment of a receiver, a person seeking appointment is to make out a case of waste or damage to the property A receiver cannot be appointed merely because it is expedient or convenient to one of the parties to do so or because it will do no harm to do so Though the appointment of receiver is discretionary, exercise of such a discretion is to be based on sound judicial principles A receiver can be appointed in case no other adequate remedy or means of accomplishing the desired object of the judicial proceeding is available It is to be based on a very good prima facie case of plaintiff succeeding in the legal proceeding In order to have a receiver appointed plaintiff not only has to show a conflicting claim to the property but must also show some emergency or damage or loss demanding immediate action It is also no more res integra that normally receiver is not to be appointed where it has an effect of depriving a defendant of a de facto possession which may cause irreparable loss to the defendant The conduct of the parties is also very relevant In Rajeshwar Nath Gupta v Administrator General & Page 32 of 53 OMP
|
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1989
|
|
|
2
|
Housing and Area Development Authority
|
AIR 1983 Bom 73
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1983
|
|
|
2
|
556 Page 24
|
556 Page 24
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1989
|
|
|
2
|
Modi Rubber Ltd v Guardian International Corporation
|
141 DLT 822
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1989
|
|
|
5
|
Marriott International Inc v Ansal Hotels Ltd and Anr
|
82 DLT 137
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1989
|
|
|
3
|
A C C C Journal No
|
22 Page 29
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1989
|
|
|
4
|