|
Ramesh Chandra v "v R Daga 20 the Supreme Court held that strict proof of perf?rmance of essential rites is not reqUired It further tried to distinguish between the legality arid the morality of relationships It observed that ke~ping in consideration the present statutory Hindu law, a bigamous marriage may be declared 17 18 19 ,20 Savitaben Somabhai Bhatya v Gujarat
|
AIR 2005 SC 1809
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 2005
|
|
|
 4
|
|
Reema Aggarwal v Anunpan
|
AIR 2004 SC 1418
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 2004
|
|
|
3
|
|
Rohtash Singh v Ramendri
|
[2000] Cr LJ 1498
|
|
India
|
circa 2000
|
|
|
2
|
|
Dwarika Prasad Satpathy v Bidut Prava Dixit
|
[2000] Cr LJ 1
|
|
India
|
circa 2000
|
|
|
1
|
|
Veena Devi v Ashok Kumar Mandal
|
[2000] Cr LJ 2332
|
|
India
|
circa 2000
|
|
|
1
|
|
Laxmi Bai v Ayodhya Prasad
|
AIR 1991 MP 47
|
|
India - Madhya Pradesh
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
1
|
|
SMT Yamunabai Anantra Adhav v Ranantra Shivram Adhav & Anr
|
[1988] INSC 24; (1988) 1 SCC 530; 1988 1 SCALE 184; 1988 1 JT 193; 1988 2 SCR 809; AIR 1988 SC 644
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
27 Jan 1988
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
22 
|
|
Narayanaswami v Padmanabhan
|
AIR 1966 Mad 394
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1966
|
|
|
1
|
