LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Smith v HM Advocate |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 2008 |
|
|||
R v JS |
[2007] NSWCCA 272; |
Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal | Australia - New South Wales | 10 Sep 2007 | AustLII |
|
|
HM Advocate v Purcell |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 2007 | LexisNexis |
|
||
"Truth or Justice - Double Jeopardy Reform for Queensland: Rights in Jeopardy" | (2007) 7 Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal 108 | Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal | Australia - Queensland | circa 2007 | AustLII |
|
|
DPP v Lynch |
[2006] TASSC 89; |
Supreme Court of Tasmania | Australia - Tasmania | 23 Oct 2006 | AustLII |
|
|
Antoun v R |
[2006] HCA 2; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 8 Feb 2006 | AustLII |
|
|
R v Deschamplain |
[2004] 3 SCR 601; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 19 Nov 2004 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
"Reform of the Double Jeopardy Rule on the Basis of Fresh and Compelling DNA Evidence in New South Wales and Queensland," | [2004] James Cook University Law Review 5 | James Cook University Law Review | Australia | circa 2004 | AustLII |
|
|
Gonshaw v Bamber |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 2004 | Westlaw |
|
||
Parris v Attorney-General |
[2003] NZCA 400; |
Court of Appeal of New Zealand | New Zealand | 13 Nov 2003 | NZLII |
|
|
"Double Jeopardy Reform: The New Evidence Exception for Acquittals" | (2003) 26 University of New South Wales Law Journal 603 | University of New South Wales Law Journal | Australia | circa 2003 | AustLII |
|
|
Lord Advocate's Reference (No 1 of 2001) |
[2002] ScotHC 35; |
Scottish High Court of Justiciary | United Kingdom - Scotland | 22 Mar 2002 | BAILII |
|
|
E v HM Advocate |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 2002 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Carroll |
[2002] HCA 55; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | circa 2002 | AustLII |
|
|
R v Arcuri |
[2001] SCC 54; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 14 Sep 2001 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v Karpavicius |
[2001] NZCA 171; |
Court of Appeal of New Zealand | New Zealand | 24 May 2001 | NZLII |
|
|
R v Flyger |
|
New Zealand | circa 2001 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Glancy v HM Advocate |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 2001 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Araujo |
[2000] SCC 65; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 14 Dec 2000 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
[2000] Ch 5 |
|
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | circa 2000 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
|
Donnelly v HM Advocate |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 2000 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Lachlan Elliot Downing | [1999] NZCA 275 | Court of Appeal of New Zealand | New Zealand | 23 Nov 1999 | NZLII |
|
|
King v HM Advocate |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1999 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Cameron v HM Advocate |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1999 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Diamond v HM Advocate |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1999 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Fox v HM Advocate |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1998 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Rowbotham |
|
circa 1994 |
|
||||
R v Fergus |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1994 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Re Ashton |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1994 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
R v MacKenzie |
|
circa 1993 |
|
||||
Farooq v HM Advocate |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1993 | Westlaw |
|
||
Auckland District Court v Attorney-General |
[1992] NZCA 239; |
Court of Appeal of New Zealand | New Zealand | 18 Dec 1992 | NZLII |
|
|
Jones v HMA |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1991 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Doney v R |
[1990] HCA 51; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 27 Nov 1990 | AustLII |
|
|
R v b (G) |
[1990] 2 SCR 57; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 7 Jun 1990 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v E t E |
|
New Zealand | circa 1990 |
|
|||
R v Morgentaler |
|
circa 1988 |
|
||||
R v Morin |
|
circa 1988 |
|
||||
R v Monteleone |
|
circa 1987 |
|
||||
Williams v R |
[1986] HCA 88; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 26 Aug 1986 | AustLII |
|
|
R v Grime |
[1985] NZCA 25; |
Court of Appeal of New Zealand | New Zealand | 3 Apr 1985 | NZLII |
|
|
McCuaig v HM Adv |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1982 | LexisNexis |
|
||
People (DPP) v O ’ Shea |
|
circa 1982 |
|
||||
Williamson v Wither |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1981 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Galbraith |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1981 | LexisNexis |
|
||
R v Turnbull |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1977 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Canada: United States of America v Shephard |
[1977] 2 SCR 1067; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 5 May 1976 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
v é zeau v R |
[1977] 2 SCR 277; |
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 1 Apr 1976 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
People (Attorney General) v Crinnion |
|
circa 1976 |
|
||||
[1975] Ch 48 |
|
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | circa 1975 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
|
R v Jenkins |
[1970] TASStRp 2; |
Australia - Tasmania | 13 Mar 1970 | AustLII |
|
||
R v Jessop |
|
Australia - Tasmania | circa 1970 |
|
|||
People (Attorney General) v McGlynn |
|
circa 1967 |
|
||||
White v R | [1947] SCR 268 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 28 Apr 1947 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
R v Fogden |
|
New Zealand | circa 1945 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Walker v R | [1939] SCR 214 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 7 Feb 1939 | Supreme Court of Canada |
|