Delhi Transport Corporation Vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court IV, Delhi & Anr
|
(2003) 105 DLT 2008
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2008
|
|
|
1
|
Ramji Purshottam v Laxmanbhai D Kurlawala IV
|
[2004] SLT 734
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 2004
|
Westlaw
|
|
1
|
Air 2004 SC 4010
|
AIR 2004 SC 4010
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 2004
|
|
|
1
|
DTC v Harpal Singh105
|
[2003] DLT 113
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 2003
|
|
|
1
|
Land Acquisition Officer-cum-DSWO Vs M/s B v Reddy & Sons
|
AIR 2002 SC 1045
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 2002
|
|
|
5
|
Air 2002 SC 2087
|
AIR 2002 SC 2087; (2002) 4 SCC 675
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 2002
|
|
|
5
|
Shyam Sunder Vs Ram Kumar & Anr
|
AIR 2001 SC 2472
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 2001
|
|
|
7
|
(2000) 3 SCC 607
|
(2000) 3 SCC 607
|
|
|
circa 2000
|
|
|
3
|
Apparel Export Promotion Council v AK Chopra
|
AIR 1999 SC 625
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 1999
|
|
|
44
|
Rameshwar Dass v Haryana
|
(1995) 3 SCC 285
|
|
|
circa 1995
|
|
|
3
|
Narender Kumar Chandla v Haryana
|
[1994] INSC 82; (1994) 4 SCC 460; 1994 1 SCR 657; 1994 2 JT 94; 1994 1 SCALE 763; AIR 1995 SC 519
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
4 Feb 1994
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
17
|
National Federation of Blind v Union Public Service Commission
|
[1993] INSC 148; 1993 2 SCALE 181; 1993 2 JT 541; 1993 2 SCC 411; 1993 2 SCR 556; AIR 1993 SC 1916
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
23 Mar 1993
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
12
|
Vishaka v Rajasthan
|
AIR 1992 SC 3011
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 1992
|
|
|
1
|
Union of India & Anr v Deoki Nandan Aggarwal
|
[1991] INSC 222; 1991 2 SCALE 481; AIR 1992 SC 96; 1992 1 SCC Supl 323
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
4 Sep 1991
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
60
|
S Sai Reddy v S Narayana Reddy
|
(1991) 3 SCC 647
|
|
|
circa 1991
|
|
|
7
|
All 'establishments,' defined to include those under the control of the Government, are under an obligation to comply with the Act, particularly Section 47 This obligation is merely an affirmation of the primary duty not to discriminate, enjoined by Article 14 of the Constitution of India The Supreme Court had recognized the need by the employer, particularly the State, to ensure rehabilitative measures to persons incurring disability This emerges from reported decisions prior to the coming into force of the Act (Ref ( Ref Rakesh Chandra Narayan v Bihar 1986 (Supp) SCC 576; BR Kapoor v Union of India
|
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 1990
|
|
|
1
|
P Mahendran v Karnataka
|
[1989] INSC 372; (1990) 1 SCC 411; 1989 2 SCALE 1274; 1989 4 JT 459; 1989 2 SCR Supl 385; AIR 1990 SC 405
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
5 Dec 1989
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
59
|
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur v Narain Shanker & Anr
|
[1980] INSC 15; 1980 2 SCC 180; 1980 2 SCR 866; AIR 1980 SC 695
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
30 Jan 1980
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
1
|
International Covenants See Jolly George Verghese v Bank of Cochin
|
[1980] SC 470
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1980
|
|
|
5
|
Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr "
|
125 DLT 742
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1990
|
|
|
2
|
Krishan Chander v DTC
|
115 DLT 559
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1990
|
|
|
1
|
Disability Act: Vijender Singh v DTC
|
105 DLT 261
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1990
|
|
|
2
|
DTC v Rajbir Singh
|
100 DLT 111
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1990
|
|
|
4
|
Baljeet Singh v Delhi Transport Corporation
|
83 DLT 286
|
|
India - Delhi
|
circa 1990
|
|
|
6
|