Limitation, latent damage and solicitor 2019U16A s negligence
|
20 PN 218
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 2019
|
Westlaw
|
|
3
|
"Judgments calling for law reform"
|
(2009) 18 Journal of Judicial Administration 141
|
Journal of Judicial Administration
|
Australia
|
circa 2009
|
Legal Online
|
|
1
|
Commerce Commission v O'Neill
|
[2007] NZCA 466; (2007) 12 TCLR 1; (2008) 8 NZBLC 102,086
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
26 Oct 2007
|
NZLII
|
|
3
|
Commerce Commission v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd
|
[2007] NZHC 1799; [2008] 1 NZLR 387; (2007) 11 TCLR 900; (2007) 8 NZBLC 102,006
|
High Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
7 Jun 2007
|
NZLII
|
|
8
|
Murray v Morel & Co Ltd
|
[2007] NZSC 27; [2007] 3 NZLR 721; [2008] NZCCLR 11; (2007) 8 NZBLC 101,945
|
Supreme Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
1 May 2007
|
NZLII
|
|
219
|
Eastern Services Ltd v
|
[2006] NZSC 42; [2006] 3 NZLR 335; (2006) 7 NZCPR 349
|
Supreme Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
15 Jun 2006
|
NZLII
|
|
45
|
Amaltal Corporation Ltd v Maruha Corporation
|
[2006] NZCA 112; [2007] 1 NZLR 608; (2006) 3 NZCCLR 1
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
1 Jun 2006
|
NZLII
|
|
62
|
Haward v Fawcetts (a firm)
|
[2006] UKHL 9; [2006] 3 All ER 497; [2006] 1 WLR 682; [2006] All ER (D) 07; [2007] Lloyds Rep PN 19
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
1 Mar 2006
|
BAILII
|
|
117
|
Murray v Morel & Co Ltd CA86/04
|
[2005] NZCA 432; [2006] 2 NZLR 366; (2005) 2 NZCCLR 1020; (2006) 9 NZCLC 264,008
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
22 Dec 2005
|
NZLII
|
|
16
|
Anheuser Busch Inc v Budweiser Budvar National Corporation
|
[2002] NZCA 264; [2003] 1 NZLR 472; (2002) 7 NZBLC 103,812
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
19 Sep 2002
|
NZLII
|
|
221
|
Stratford v Phillips Shayle-George & Co
|
[2001] NZCA 299; (2001) 15 PRNZ 573; (2001) 21 FRNZ 307
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
21 Aug 2001
|
NZLII
|
|
17
|
X v Y
|
[2000] 2 NZLR 748
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 2000
|
LexisNexis
|
|
27
|
Paragon Finance plc v DB Thakerar & Co
|
[1998] EWCA Civ 1249; [1999] 1 All ER 400
|
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division
|
United Kingdom - England and Wales
|
21 Jul 1998
|
BAILII
|
|
485
|
Direen v Commerce Commission
|
(1998) 8 TCLR 444
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1998
|
|
|
3
|
Neumegen v Neumegen & Co
|
[1998] 3 NZLR 310; (1998) 8 TCLR 299
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1998
|
LexisNexis
|
|
66
|
"Time and the Blamelessly Ignorant Plaintiff: A Review of the Reasonable Discoverability Doctrine and Secion 4 of the Limitation Act 1950"
|
(1998) 9 Otago Law Review 255
|
Otago Law Review
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1998
|
NZLII
|
|
5
|
Nippon Credit Bank Ltd v Air New Zealand Ltd
|
[1998] 2 NZLR 1; (1997) 8 TCLR 106
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1998
|
LexisNexis
|
|
4
|
Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council
|
[1996] UKHL 12; [1996] AC 669; [1996] 2 All ER 961; [1996] 2 WLR 802; 64 Page 715B/C
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
22 May 1996
|
BAILII
|
|
668
|
G D Searle & Co v Gunn
|
[1996] NZCA 433; [1996] 2 NZLR 129; (1996) 5 NZBLC 104,099
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
24 Apr 1996
|
NZLII
|
|
45
|
Invercargill City Council v Hamlin
|
[1996] 1 NZLR 513
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1996
|
LexisNexis
|
|
224
|
Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v Securities Commission
|
[1995] 3 NZLR 7
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1995
|
LexisNexis
|
|
61
|
S v G
|
[1995] 3 NZLR 681; [1995] PRNZ 465; (1995) 2 HRNZ 11
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1995
|
LexisNexis
|
|
83
|
Invercargill City Council v Hamlin
|
[1994] NZCA 562; [1994] 3 NZLR 513; (1994) 5 NZBLC 103,522
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
1 Sep 1994
|
NZLII
|
|
165
|
Murray v Eliza Jane Holdings Ltd CA224/92
|
[1993] NZCA 335; (1993) 5 TCLR 272; (1993) 6 PRNZ 251
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
26 Mar 1993
|
NZLII
|
|
23
|
Nash v Eli Lilly & Co
|
[1993] 4 All ER 383; [1993] 1 WLR 782; [1992] 3 Med LR 353; (1992) 14 BMLR 1
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1993
|
LexisNexis
|
|
118
|
Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia
|
[1992] HCA 55; 175 CLR 514; (1992) 109 ALR 247; (1992) 66 ALJR 839; (1992) 30 ATPR 41-189
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
28 Oct 1992
|
AustLII
|
|
1709
|
McKenzie v Attorney-General CA340/90
|
[1991] NZCA 105; [1992] 2 NZLR 14; [1991] NZAR 501
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
12 Sep 1991
|
NZLII
|
|
44
|
Halford v Brookes
|
[1991] 3 All ER 559; [1991] 1 WLR 428
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1991
|
LexisNexis
|
|
122
|
Dennis v Charnwood Borough Council
|
[1983] QB 409; [1982] 3 All ER 486; [1982] 3 WLR 1064; [1983-84] ANZ Conv R 73
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1983
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
25
|
Ampthill Peerage
|
[1977] AC 547
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1977
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
160
|
Cartledge v E Jopling & Sons Ltd
|
[1963] AC 758; [1963] 1 All ER 341
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1963
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
300
|
Urie v Thompson
|
337 US 163; 11 ALR 2d 252; 93 L Ed 1282; 69 SCt 1018; 93 L Ed 2d 1282
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
31 May 1949
|
WorldLII
|
|
273
|
Howell v Young
|
(1820) 3 B & Ald 288; 106 ER 668; 61 LT 551; 5 B & C 259
|
Kings Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1820
|
WorldLII
|
|
54
|
591 NZPD 8763
|
591 NZPD 8763
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1996
|
|
|
1
|