LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Consistent with this approach, it is well settled that the refusal to extend the time for bringing proceedings is an interlocutory decision not a final decision In Bienstein the High Court (McHugh, Kirby and Callinan JJ) said at [25] that the refusal to grant an extension of time was not a final judgment because the unsuccessful party could make a further application for the same relief, although the application might have very little prospect of success In Hodgson v Dimbola Pty Ltd t/as Towers Removals     2

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
GP v McKenzie	[2018] ACAT 96	Australian Capital Territory Civil and Administrative Tribunal	Australia - Australian Capital Territory	12 Oct 2018	AustLII		10
Piscioneri v Reardon	[2016] ACTCA 33	Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory - Court of Appeal	Australia - Australian Capital Territory	10 Aug 2016	AustLII		8

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Castillon v P & O Ports Ltd	[2007] QCA 364; [2008] 2 Qd R 219	Supreme Court of Queensland - Court of Appeal	Australia - Queensland	26 Oct 2007	AustLII		70
Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd	[1998] HCA 48; (1998) 194 CLR 395; (1998) 155 ALR 614; (1998) 72 ALJR 1243; (1998) 23 Fam LR 575; (1998) 13 Leg Rep 2	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	6 Aug 1998	AustLII		538
Royal North Shore Hospital v Henderson	(1986) 7 NSWLR 283		Australia - New South Wales	circa 1986	LexisNexis AU		43
Do Carmo v Ford Excavations Pty Ltd	[1984] HCA 17; (1984) 154 CLR 234; (1984) 52 ALR 231; (1984) 58 ALJR 287; [1984] Aust Torts Reports 80-302	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	4 Apr 1984	AustLII		303