LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite

Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Mohd Hasnain v Jagram Meena - MacApp 152/2014   flag 

[2014] INDLHC 1465
High Court of Delhi
India
24th March, 2014

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name †  Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
(2012) 11 SCC 738 (2012) 11 SCC 738 circa 2012 4
Air 2005 SC 2157 AIR 2005 SC 2157 Supreme Court of India India circa 2005 flag 16
Air 2005 SC 2985 AIR 2005 SC 2985 Supreme Court of India India circa 2005 flag 6
Air 2006 SC 2688 AIR 2006 SC 2688 Supreme Court of India India circa 2006 flag 1
Bilkish v United India Insurance [2008] ACJ 1357 circa 2008 1
Gammell v Wilson [1982] AC 27; [1981] 1 All ER 578; [1981] 2 WLR 248 United Kingdom circa 1982 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 87
General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v Susamma Thomas (Mrs) [1993] INSC 2; (1994) 2 SCC 176; 1993 4 SCALE 643; [1993] JT 573; AIR 1994 SC 1631; [1994] SCC (Cri) 335 Supreme Court of India India 6 Jan 1993 LIIofIndia flag 220
Nance v British Columbia Electric Railway Co Ltd [1951] AC 601; [1951] 2 All ER 448; 2 TLR 137 United Kingdom circa 1951 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 265
National Insurance Co Ltd v Shyam Singh (2011) 7 SCC 65 circa 2011 8
New India Assurance Co Ltd v Shanti Pathak (Smt) (2007) 10 SCC 1 circa 2007 18
Pickett v British Rail Engineering Ltd [1980] AC 136; [1979] 1 All ER 774 United Kingdom circa 1980 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 145
PS Somanathan v Distt Insurance Officer [2011] ACJ 737 circa 2011 1
Ramesh Chandra v MP State Road Transport Corporation [1983] ACJ 221 circa 1983 1
Ramesh Singh & Anr v Satbir Singh & Anr (2008) 2 SCC 667 circa 2008 8
Reshma Kumari Vs Madan Mohan & Anr (2013) 9 SCC 65; 5 JT 2015 circa 2015 22
SC; (ii) Fakeerappa v Karnataka Cement [2004] ACJ 699 circa 2004 3
SC; (v) Sarla Verma v DTC (2009) 6 SCC 121 circa 2009 313
Schedule and the 'multiplier' figures got wrongly typed as 15, 16, 17, 18, 17, 16, 15, 13, 11, 8, 5 & 5 instead of 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 12, 10, 8, 6 and 5 Another noticeable incongruity is, having prescribed the notional minimum income of non-earning persons as MAC Appeal Nos 152/2014, 232/2013, 1190/2012 & 196/2013 Page 13 of 21 Rs 15,000/- per annum, the table prescribes the compensation payable even in cases where the annual income ranges between Rs 3000/- and Rs 12000/- This leads to an anomalous position in regard to applications under Section 163A of MV Act, as the compensation will be higher in cases where the deceased was idle and not having any income, than in cases where the deceased was honestly earning an income ranging between Rs 3000/- and Rs 12,000/- per annum Be that as it may 18 The principles relating to determination of liability and quantum of compensation are different for claims made under Section 163A of MV Act and claims under Section 166 of MV Act (See : Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v Meena Variyal Supreme Court of India India circa 2007 flag 1
Susamma Thomas, Trilok Chandra's and New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs Charlie (2009) 10 SCC 720 circa 2009 1
UP State Road Transport Corporation v Trilok Chandra [1996] ACJ 831 circa 1996 30
Up v Ramesh Chandra Sharma [1996] INSC 896; (1995) 6 SCC 527; (1996) 6 SCALE 1; AIR 1996 SC 864; (1996) 7 JT 359 Supreme Court of India India 6 Aug 1996 LIIofIndia flag 13

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback