|
[2003] EWHC 474 (Ch is that to conclude that a party has agreed to submit to the jurisdiction the act must be unequivocal and only explained by consent to submit In the context in which they took place these acts were too equivocal to constitute evidence of submission to the jurisdiction and the acknowledgement of service filed 1 March 2017 clearly reserved the eighth defendants position I therefore dismiss that part of the application)
|
[2003] EWHC 474 (Ch is that to conclude that a party has agreed to submit to the jurisdiction the act must be unequivocal and only explained by)
|
High Court of England and Wales
|
United Kingdom - England and Wales
|
circa 2017
|
BAILII
|
|
|
