Chang v Lee
|
[2017] NZCA 308; [2017] NZAR 1223; (2017) 4 NZTR 27-011
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
19 Jul 2017
|
NZLII
|
|
27
|
Wakenshaw v Wakenshaw
|
[2017] NZCA 252; [2018] NZAR 532
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
14 Jun 2017
|
NZLII
|
|
24
|
Harvey v Beveridge
|
[2014] NZCA 72; [2014] NZAR 677; (2014) 15 NZCPR 205; (2014) 29 FRNZ 539; (2014) 3 NZTR 24-003
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
20 Mar 2014
|
NZLII
|
|
26
|
Crampton-Smith v Crampton-Smith
|
[2012] NZCA 308
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
16 Jul 2012
|
NZLII
|
|
4
|
Pecore v Pecore
|
[2007] 1 SCR 795; [2007] SCC 17; [2007] SCJ No 17
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
3 May 2007
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
|
26
|
Stack v Dowden
|
[2007] UKHL 17; [2007] 2 AC 432; [2007] 2 All ER 929; [2007] 2 WLR 831; [2007] All ER (D) 208; [2007] 2 WR 831
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
25 Apr 2007
|
BAILII
|
|
535
|
Clark v Libra Developments Ltd
|
[2007] 2 NZLR 709
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 2007
|
LexisNexis
|
|
38
|
"The Presumption of Advancement: A Renaissance?"
|
(2007) 123 Law Quarterly Review 347
|
Law Quarterly Review
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 2007
|
Westlaw
|
|
1
|
Chirnside v Fay
|
[2006] NZSC 68; [2007] 1 NZLR 433; (2006) 8 NZBLC 101,831; (2006) 3 NZCCLR 176
|
Supreme Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
6 Sep 2006
|
NZLII
|
|
196
|
Hostick v New Zealand Railway & Locomotive Society Waikato Branch Inc
|
[2006] NZHC 807; [2006] 3 NZLR 842; [2006] NZAR 609
|
High Court of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
12 Jul 2006
|
NZLII
|
|
5
|
M Young Legal Associates Ltd v Zahid (a firm)
|
[2006] EWCA Civ 613; [2006] 1 WLR 2562; [2006] All ER (D) 227
|
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division
|
United Kingdom - England and Wales
|
16 May 2006
|
BAILII
|
|
26
|
Potter v Potter
|
[2004] UKPC 41; [2005] 2 NZLR 1
|
Privy Council
|
New Zealand
|
22 Jul 2004
|
BAILII
|
|
7
|
Potter v Potter
|
[2003] NZCA 103; [2003] 3 NZLR 145; [2003] NZFLR 1035
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
12 Jun 2003
|
NZLII
|
|
76
|
Thexton v Thexton
|
[2001] 1 NZLR 237
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 2001
|
LexisNexis
|
|
15
|
Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council
|
[1996] UKHL 12; [1996] AC 669; [1996] 2 All ER 961; [1996] 2 WLR 802; 64 Page 715B/C
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
22 May 1996
|
BAILII
|
|
668
|
Lankow v Rose
|
[1994] NZCA 262; [1995] 1 NZLR 277; (1994) 12 FRNZ 682; [1995] NZFLR 1
|
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
|
New Zealand
|
2 Dec 1994
|
NZLII
|
|
264
|
Paul v Constance
|
[1976] EWCA Civ 2; [1977] 1 All ER 195; [1977] 1 WLR 527
|
England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division
|
United Kingdom - England and Wales
|
8 Jul 1976
|
BAILII
|
|
61
|
Bateman TV Ltd v Bateman
|
[1971] NZLR 453
|
|
New Zealand
|
circa 1971
|
LexisNexis
|
|
26
|
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Williamson
|
(1928) 14 Tax Cas 335
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1928
|
|
|
26
|
Knight v Knight
|
[1840] EngR 862; (1840) 3 Beav 148; 49 ER 58
|
Rolls Court
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1840
|
CommonLII
|
|
89
|