LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
2020 Tsar 35-48 |
|
South Africa | circa 2020 |
|
|||
2020 Tsar 37-40 |
|
South Africa | circa 2020 |
|
|||
IPCom GMBH & Co KG v Vodafone Group Plc | [2020] EWHC 132 | High Court of England and Wales | United Kingdom - England and Wales | circa 2020 | BAILII |
|
|
"Expropriation without Compensation: A Yawning Gap in the Justification of Expropriation?" |
|
South African Law Journal | South Africa | circa 2019 | HeinOnline |
|
|
[2014] Australian Intellectual Property Journal 74 | Australian Intellectual Property Journal | Australia | circa 2014 | Legal Online |
|
||
"Plugging the Leak in § 1498: Coercing the United States into Notifying Patent Owners of Government Use" | [2012] Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 879 | Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law | United States | circa 2012 | HeinOnline / LexisNexis |
|
|
Ausplow (Pty) Ltd v Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd (742/10) |
[2011] ZASCA 123; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 7 Sep 2011 | SAFLII |
|
|
MMI Research v Cellxion | [2009] EWHC 1533 | High Court of England and Wales | United Kingdom - England and Wales | circa 2009 | BAILII |
|
|
Nielsen and Nicol | [2008] FedLRev 336 | Federal Law Review | Australia | circa 2008 | AustLII |
|
|
Nielsen and Nicol | [2008] FedLRev 339 | Federal Law Review | Australia | circa 2008 | AustLII |
|
|
Nielsen and Nicol | [2008] FedLRev 340 | Federal Law Review | Australia | circa 2008 | AustLII |
|
|
Nielsen and Nicol | [2008] FedLRev 354 | Federal Law Review | Australia | circa 2008 | AustLII |
|
|
Nielsen and Nicol | [2008] FedLRev 360 | Federal Law Review | Australia | circa 2008 | AustLII |
|
|
Nielsen and Nicol | [2008] FedLRev 361 | Federal Law Review | Australia | circa 2008 | AustLII |
|
|
"Whither Patent Use without Authorisation in Australia?" | [2008] FedLRev 333 | Federal Law Review | Australia | circa 2008 | AustLII |
|
|
[2007] Derebus 45-46 |
|
circa 2007 |
|
||||
[2007] Derebus 45 |
|
circa 2007 |
|
||||
Schlumberger Logelco Inc v Coflexip S A (700/98) |
[2000] ZASCA 25; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 25 May 2000 | SAFLII |
|
|
Henry Brothers (Magherafelt) v Ministry of Defence |
|
circa 1999 |
|
||||
Ensign Bickford (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd v AECI Explosives and Chemicals Ltd (4/95) |
[1998] ZASCA 73; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 21 Sep 1998 | SAFLII |
|
|
Premier Hangers CC v Polyoak (Pty) Ltd |
[1996] ZASCA 119; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 27 Sep 1996 | SAFLII |
|
|
Roman Roller CC v Speedmark Holdings (Pty) Ltd |
[1995] ZASCA 78; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 22 Aug 1995 | SAFLII |
|
|
Stack v Brisbane City Council |
[1995] FCA 1427; |
Federal Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 4 Aug 1995 | AustLII |
|
|
"Patent Law – A City Council is an 'Authority of a State'" | [1995] Queensland Law Society Journal 555 | Queensland Law Society Journal | Australia - Queensland | circa 1995 |
|
||
[1995] Queensland Law Society Journal 55 | [1995] Queensland Law Society Journal 55 | Queensland Law Society Journal | Australia - Queensland | circa 1995 |
|
||
Dory v Sheffield Health Authority |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1991 |
|
|||
Letraset Ltd v Helios Ltd |
|
South Africa | circa 1972 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Patchett's Patent |
|
circa 1967 |
|
||||
Patchett's Patent |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1967 |
|
|||
Pfizer Corporation v Ministry of Health |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1965 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) |
[1964] HCA 69; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 9 Nov 1964 | AustLII |
|
|
Dixon v London Small Arms Co Ltd |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1876 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Feather v R |
[1865] EngR 205; |
Kings Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1865 | CommonLII |
|