LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Re 10 Roseberry Drive, St Andrew    

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name †	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
"/20] Even if the applicant satisfies one or more of those requirements, it must also satisfy the court that it is just and equitable, in the circumstances, that the court should grant an application for discharge or modification of the relevant covenant This is because the discharge or modification of restrictive covenants falls within the equitable jurisdiction of the court In Re Covenant Community Church (1990)	(1990) 27 JLR 368		Jersey	circa 1990			2
(1969) 11 JLR 387	(1969) 11 JLR 387		Jersey	circa 1969			4
(1986) 23 JLR 543	(1986) 23 JLR 543		Jersey	circa 1986			1
(1986) 34 Wir 189	(1986) 34 WIR 189			circa 1986			3
(1998) 53 Wir 261	(1998) 53 WIR 261			circa 1998			1
Lolakis v Konitsas	[2002] NSWSC 889; (2002) 11 BPR 20,499	Supreme Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	4 Oct 2002	AustLII		15
Re Davis' Application	(1950) 7 P & CR 1		United Kingdom	circa 1950			10
Re Ghey and Galton s Application	[1957] 3 All ER 164		United Kingdom	circa 1957	LexisNexis		9
Re Truman, Hanbury, Buxton and Co Ltd's Application	[1956] 1 QB 261; [1955] 3 All ER 559		United Kingdom	circa 1956	LexisNexis / Westlaw		87