Ar Antulay v RS Nayak & Anr
|
[1988] INSC 123; 1988 2 SCC 602; AIR 1988 SC 1531; 1988 1 SCR Supl 1; [1988] SCC (Cri) 372
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 1988
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
146
|
Chinnammal v P Arumugham & Anr
|
[1990] INSC 13; AIR 1990 SC 1828; 1990 1 SCR 78; 1990 1 SCC 513; 1990 1 JT 51; 1990 1 SCALE 43
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
circa 1990
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
1
|
Indeed, 'he is evidently a speculative purchaser and in that respect he is in no better position than the decree holder purchas- er [85B-C] Chhota Nagpur Banking Association v CTM Smith, [1943] Patna 325 and Jamnomal Gurdinomal v Gopaldas
|
AIR 1924 Sind 101
|
|
Pakistan
|
circa 1924
|
|
|
2
|
Janak Raj v Gurdial Singh & Anr
|
[1966] INSC 249; [1967] 2 SCR 77; AIR 1967 SC 608
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
8 Nov 1966
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
17
|
R Raghavachari v MA Pekkiri Mahomed Rowther
|
AIR 1917 Mad 250
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1917
|
|
|
1
|
Rodger v The Comptoir De Paris
|
[1869-71] LR 3 PC 465
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1869
|
|
|
87
|
Sardar Govindrao Mahadik & Anr v Devi Sahai
|
[1981] INSC 206; 1982 1 SCALE 191; 1982 2 SCR 186
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
15 Dec 1981
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
2
|
17 Mad 250
|
17 Mad 250
|
|
India
|
circa 1924
|
|
|
1
|
513 JT 1990
|
513 JT 1990
|
|
|
circa 1990
|
|
|
1
|