LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Hammonds v Aetna Cas & Sur Co , NDOhio   flag  5

237 FSupp 96
Federal Supplement
United States

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Pilmer v The Duke Group Ltd (in liq) [2001] HCA 31; (2001) 207 CLR 165; (2001) 180 ALR 249; (2001) 75 ALJR 1067; (2001) 38 ACSR 122; 19 ACLC 1; [2001] Aust Torts Reports 81-608; (2001) 49 ATR 324; (2001) 22 Leg Rep 27 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 31 May 2001 AustLII flag 485
Pilmer v The Duke Group Ltd (in liq) [2001] HCA 31; (2001) 207 CLR 165; (2001) 180 ALR 249; (2001) 75 ALJR 1067; (2001) 38 ACSR 122; 19 ACLC 1; [2001] Aust Torts Reports 81-608; (2001) 49 ATR 324; (2001) 22 Leg Rep 27 Australia 31 May 2001 AustLII flag 1
Panko v Consolidated Mutual Insurance Co [1970] USCA3 4 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit United States 5 Jan 1970 WorldLII flag
Panko v Consolidated Mutual Insurance Co 423 F2d 41 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit United States 23 Sep 1969 WorldLII flag 1

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title Citation(s) Author Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
"Comparing Apples and Oranges: The Fiduciary Principle in Australia and Canada after Breen v Williams" (1996) 8 (2) Bond Law Review 158 Dorsett, Shaunnagh Australia circa 1996 AustLII flag

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback