LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Note "No second appeal was given with the result that after the said finding of fact '* surrender the rent became Rs 12-l3-5gds and (b) Landlord and tenant--Separate tenancies the plaintiff has claimed in this suit rent at 4 and B amalgamated--Tenant dispossessed by this rate from the year 1342 to the Asar kist landlord from portion of A--Tenant can claim of 1345 The material defences taken by the suspension of rent only of A When two plots of land forming separate tenancies defendant are two in number First of all he with separate assessment of rent are amalgamated so said that the two enhancements of rent of the as to form one tenancy in the eye of law and the parent jama of 50 bighas, namely, the enhance tenant is dispossessed by the landlord from a portion of ment to Rs l3-2-l8gds and subsequently to one of the plots, the tenant cannot claim suspension of the whole rent but only of tbe rent of the plot from Rs 16-5-igd were illegal enhancements, inas a portion of which he has been dispossessed : ( 29) 16 much as those enhancements contravened the     2

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Bibi Samsunnehar v Hari Nath	[1942] AllINRprCal 34; [1943] AIR Cal 91	All India Reporter - Calcutta	India - West Bengal	12 May 1942	AsianLII
Binjraj Maheswria v Ramniwasdas Jalan	[1942] AllINRprCal 33; [1943] AIR Cal 89	All India Reporter - Calcutta	India - West Bengal	5 Jan 1942	AsianLII