LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases matching this search | Law Reform Reports matching this search | Law Journal Articles matching this search

Help
Show filtered results

Matching Cases: 48

Case Name †  Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
Ahmedabad v Moti Lal Hirabhai Spinning and Manufacturing Co Ltd Ahmedabad AIR 1936 PC 77 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Air 1936 PC 171 AIR 1936 PC 171 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Air 1936 PC 183 AIR 1936 PC 183 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag
Air 1936 PC 1834 AIR 1936 PC 1834 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag
Air 1936 PC 193 AIR 1936 PC 193 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Air 1936 PC 1936 AIR 1936 PC 1936 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Air 1936 PC 204 AIR 1936 PC 204 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 3
Air 1936 PC 24210 AIR 1936 PC 24210 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag
Air 1936 PC 246 AIR 1936 PC 246 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 4
Air 1936 PC 252 AIR 1936 PC 252 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Air 1936 PC 258 AIR 1936 PC 258 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Air 1936 PC 264 AIR 1936 PC 264 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Air 1936 PC 27 AIR 1936 PC 27 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Air 1936 PC 277 AIR 1936 PC 277 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 3
Air 1936 PC 285 AIR 1936 PC 285 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Air 1936 PC 301 AIR 1936 PC 301 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Air 1936 PC 318 AIR 1936 PC 318 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Air 1936 PC 3187 AIR 1936 PC 3187 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Air 1936 PC 332 AIR 1936 PC 332 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Air 1936 PC 34 AIR 1936 PC 34 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Air 1936 PC 49 AIR 1936 PC 49 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 3
Air 1936 PC 55 AIR 1936 PC 55 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Air 1936 PC 63 AIR 1936 PC 63 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Air 1936 PC 8 AIR 1936 PC 8 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag
Air 1936 PC 833 AIR 1936 PC 833 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Air 1936 PC 91 AIR 1936 PC 91 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Andre Paul Terence Ambard Vs The Attorney General for Trinidad and Tabago AIR 1936 PC 141 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 16
Attygalle v Emperor AIR 1936 PC 169 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 11
Ballabh Das v Nur Mohammad AIR 1936 PC 83 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Bhojraj v Sita Ram AIR 1936 PC 60 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 7
Bhojraj v Sita Ram AIR 1936 PC 66 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Currimbhoy Ebrahim and Sons AIR 1936 PC 1 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Effuah Amissah v Effuah Krabah AIR 1936 PC 147 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Frederick Emmanuel Abeyesundera v Ceylon Exports Ltd AIR 1936 PC 259 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Geogre , Friar Grahame v Attorney General, Fiji AIR 1936 PC 224 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 4
Hem Singh v Basant Das AIR 1936 PC 93 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 7
Krishna Roy v Mirza Mahammad Syed Ali Mutawali AIR 1936 PC 15 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Mahadeo v R AIR 1936 PC 242 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 5
Mt Binda Kuer v Lalita Prasad AIR 1936 PC 304 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
N "No second appeal lies on the ground of an erroneous finding of In the first place objection is taken to the fact.'* finding of Bo»e J that the findings of the (b) C P Tenancy Act (1920), S 2 (5) (d) -- Courts below that these buildings were not Agricultural holding--Building constructed -- Prima facie there is diversion -- Tenant must erected for the convenient or profitable use prove contrary or occupation of the holding (vide the Prfma facie the erection of a building on land words of s. 2 (5) (d), C P Tenancy Act), which is let for agricultural purposes, that is to and were not consistent with the pur say, for the purpose of being cultivated and for no other purpose, is a diversion for non-agricultural pose for which it was let are findings of fact uses; and once the fapt of the erection of a sub which cannot be raised in second appeal, stantial building is established it is for the tenant and reliance has been placed on the Privy to show that it has been built in circumstances Council decision in Privy Council India circa 1936 flag
Nazi Ahmed v Emperor AIR 1936 PC 256 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 1
Nazir Ahmad v King Emperor AIR 1936 PC 253 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 104
Nazir Ahmed v King Emperor AIR 1936 PC 243 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag
Poornandachi v Gopalasami AIR 1936 PC 281 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 2
Rangoon AIR 1936 PC 230 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 19
Stephen Seneviratne v R AIR 1936 PC 289 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 15
Tyagaraja Mudaliyar v Vedathanni AIR 1936 PC 70 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag 6
Verwaltung Gimb H v Indian Oil Corporation Ltd) and AIR 1936 PC 760 Privy Council India circa 1936 flag

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback