LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Brenhilda " (4) and C P Narain Singh v B P Narain Singh (5)] Since Ba Thein, the Copyist himself has appeared and sworn to the genuineness of the copies and the signatures appearing thereon, the presumption asked to be drawn under section 90 of the Evidence Act need not be taken into account Nevertheless, unless the contrary is shown there is a presumption that the acts of a Court have been regularly carried out [See Bijnath v Sri Bhagwau (6)] and it cannot but be conceded that the copies now filed by the defendants are genuine and correct The statement contained in the documents Exhibits I and VI, the one an admission made by the plaintiff himself and the other, a fact sworn to by the deceased U)     2

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
Emperor v P R Mehta, representative of Bhaidas Karsandas and Co, Cotton Firm, Khamgaon	[1940] AllINRprNag 51; [1940] ILR Nag 615; 42 Cr LJ 66; [1940] AIR Nag 385	All India Reporter - Nagpur	India - Maharashtra	23 May 1940	AsianLII
Ganptrao Yadorao Pande v Nagorao Vinayakrao Joshi	[1939] AllINRprNag 112; [1940] AIR Nag 382	All India Reporter - Nagpur	India - Maharashtra	18 Oct 1939	AsianLII