LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Decided "A" form certificate which disclosed merely on 3rd May 1940, against decree of Sub a title in him, but the appellants if they had Judge, Mayavaram, in A S No 42 of 1936 taken the prudent course of searching the Hindu Law--Adoption--On death of adopted registers in the Registrar's office before ac son adoptive mother making adoption to her cepting his title would not have been in the deceased husband--Estate vested in her as heir predicament which they are now in to first adopted son is divested The point of limitation does not require Where on the death of an aurasa or adopted son the estate which has descended to him from his much discussion as there is the authority of father vests in his mother as heir, and she makes this Court which bound the learned Judge an adoption to her deceased husband, the estate so and binds us The appellants say that the vested in her will be divested: 24 WB183, Dissent; article of the Limitation Act which applies     1

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Gokuldoss Jamnadoss and Co v M Lakshminarasimhalu Chetti	[1939] AllINRprMad 382; [1940] AIR Mad 920	All India Reporter - Madras	India - Tamil Nadu	22 Aug 1939	AsianLII