Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Acetylene Illuminating Co Ltd v United Alkali Co Ltd 4

(1925) 22 RPC 145

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Phillips v Symes (No 3)	[2008] EWCA Civ 311; [2008] 2 All ER 537; [2008] RPC 437; [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 918; [2008] 1 WLR 180; [2008] All ER (D) 152; [2008] 1 Lloyds Rep 344	England and Wales Court of Appeal - Civil Division	United Kingdom - England and Wales	10 Apr 2008	BAILII		88
Nicaro Holdings Pty Ltd v Martin Engineering Co	[1990] FCA 40; (1990) 91 ALR 513; 16 IPR 545; [1990] AIPC 90-670	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	19 Feb 1990	AustLII		557
Van Berkel v R D Simpson, Ltd	[1906] ScotLR 44_87		United Kingdom - Scotland	24 Nov 1906	BAILII

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
"Interpretation of Section 3(d) in the Indian Patents Act 2005: A Case Study of Novartis"	[2008] INJlIPLaw 2	Raju, K D	India	circa 2008	LIIofIndia

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback