Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Edwards v Hirschman 1

[1900] NSWLawRp 34; 21 LR (NSW) 116; 16 WN (NSW) 244

Supreme Court of New South Wales

Australia - New South Wales

22nd June, 1900

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title †	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
"Is Intentionalist Theory Indispensable to Statutory Interpretation?"	(2017) 43 Monash University Law Review 238	Blaker, Jamie	Australia	circa 2017	AustLII		1

Legislation Cited

sSMA1996N138269.PDF.SINO_TEXT, s1, s17

Legislation Name

Provision

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name †	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Hill v Scott	8 WN 98		United Kingdom				1
IckeTson v Hayes	5 SCR 158						1
Lilley v Rankin	56 LJQB 248		United Kingdom				5
Shillito v Theed	[1831] EngR 551; 7 Bing 405; 131 ER 156	Court of Common Pleas	United Kingdom	circa 1831	CommonLII		4
William Reed, Appellant; Edward Wiggins, Respondent	[1862] EngR 1042; 143 ER 88; (1862) 13 CBNS 220	Court of Common Pleas	United Kingdom	circa 1862	CommonLII		1
2 QB 337	2 QB 337		United Kingdom		LexisNexis / Westlaw		1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback