LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
Daniele v Weissenberger |
[2002] WASCA 289; |
Supreme Court of Western Australia - Court of Appeal | Australia - Western Australia | 23 Oct 2002 | AustLII |
|
|
Minagall v Ingram | [1968] SASC 112 | Supreme Court of South Australia | Australia - South Australia | 26 Sep 1968 | AustLII |
|
Journal Article Title | Citation(s) | Author | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
"Could Existing Anticruelty Laws Ban Whip Use in Horse Racing?" | (2022) 43 Adelaide Law Review 439 | Timoshanko, Aaron | Australia | circa 2022 | AustLII |
|
Legislation Name | Provision |
The Act (SA) | s7 |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
[1915] Sec 4 |
|
United States | circa 1915 |
|
|||
(1860) 5 H & N 38 |
|
Court of Exchequer | United Kingdom | circa 1860 |
|
||
"Could Existing Anticruelty Laws Ban Whip Use in Horse Racing?" | (2022) 43 Adelaide Law Review 439 | Timoshanko, Aaron | Australia | circa 2022 | AustLII |
|
|
Minagall v Ingram | [1968] SASC 112 | Supreme Court of South Australia | Australia - South Australia | 26 Sep 1968 | AustLII |
|