LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Abdul Majid Khan v Dattoo Raoji    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s) †	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
[1936] Mad 881	[1936] Mad 881		India	circa 1936			8
[1932] Nag 118	[1932] Nag 118		India - Maharashtra	circa 1932			1
[1931] Cal 223	[1931] Cal 223		United States - California	circa 1931			4
[1926] Mad 1024; 4 Nag 24	[1926] Mad 1024; 4 Nag 24		India - Maharashtra	circa 1926			4
97 IC 592	97 IC 592		United Kingdom				3
91 IC 200	91 IC 200		United Kingdom				1
62 Cal 257u	62 Cal 257U		United States - California				1
51 Gal 96912	51 Gal 96912		United States				1
Annapurnabai v Buprao	51 Cal 969		United States - California				5
28 NLR 14210	28 NLR 14210		Sri Lanka				1
28 NLR 142	28 NLR 142		Sri Lanka				1
17 P 19	17 P 19						3
8 Own 2945	8 OWN 2945		Canada - Ontario				1
8 CWN 2945	8 CWN 2945		India				1
8 CWN 294	8 CWN 294		India				13
8 CWN 29i6	8 CWN 29I6		India				1
Air 1940 Mad 140	AIR 1940 Mad 140; [1940] LR Mad 306		India - Tamil Nadu	circa 1940			2
Air 1935 Cal 146	AIR 1935 Cal 146		India - West Bengal	circa 1935			1
Air 1932 All 65	AIR 1932 All 65		India - Uttar Pradesh	circa 1932			1
Air 1929 Bom 359	AIR 1929 Bom 359		India - Maharashtra	circa 1929			2
Air 1927 Cal 548	AIR 1927 Cal 548		India - West Bengal	circa 1927			2
Air 1926 Nag 245	AIR 1926 Nag 245		India - Maharashtra	circa 1926			1
Dattoo "Raoji and others. in fact no appeal at all but a cross-objection and Miso. Civil Case No. 92 of 1942, Decided on 8th no argument is advanced or indeed can be advan October 1945, for leave to appeal to Privy Council ced against the acceptance'of the cross* objection, no against order of this Court, in F. A. No. 64 of 1937, leave to appeal to the Privy Council should be given: D/- 27th February 1942. Observations of Niamat Ullah /., in ('35) 22 A.I.R*. (a) Civil P.C. (1908), S. 110--Substantial ques 1935 All. 374 (F. B.), Approved·; ('32) 19 A. I. R*. tion of law--High Court applying legal principles 1932 All. 65 (F. B.), Dissent8 C. W. N. 294 held to facts of case and rejecting appellant's conten overruled by ('25) 12		Privy Council	India	circa 1925			3
Air 1922 All 243; 66 IC 721	AIR 1922 All 243; 66 IC 721		India - Uttar Pradesh	circa 1922			1
Air 193 All 374	AIR 193 All 374		India - Uttar Pradesh	circa 1925			1