LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
Prendergast v Turton |
[1841] EngR 1133; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | circa 1841 | CommonLII |
|
|
10 RF 1977 |
|
Brazil | circa 1977 |
|
|||
6 Hlcas 632 |
|
House of Lords | United Kingdom |
|
|||
[1969] SC 474 |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1969 |
|
|||
Wazirchand Mahajan & Anr v Union of India |
[1966] INSC 161; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 12 Sep 1966 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
[1941] Mad 175 |
|
India | circa 1941 |
|
|||
Garden Gully United Quartz Mining Co v McLister |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1875 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
[1967] SC 990 |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1967 |
|
|||
[1964] SC 752 |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1964 |
|
|||
(1948) 52 CWN 343 |
|
India | circa 1948 |
|
|||
Jones v North Vancouver Land and Improvement Co |
[1910] UKLawRpAC 11; |
United Kingdom | 18 Mar 1910 | CommonLII |
|
||
Madhu Sudan Chowdhri v Musammat Chandrabati Chowdhraizi |
|
India | circa 1966 |
|
|||
4 All Er 116 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1966 | LexisNexis |
|
||
[1965] SC 540 |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1965 |
|
|||
Sarvamangal Dasi v Paritosh Kumar Das | India - West Bengal | circa 1952 |
|
||||
Code " in the first column of that article If those words had actually been used in that column then a subsequent amendment of articles 158 and 178 certainly would not have affected the meaning of that article If, however, as a result of judicial construction, those words have come to be read into the first column as if those words actually occurred therein we are not of opinion, as at present advised, that the subsequent amendment of articles 158 and 178 must necessarily and automatically have the effect of altering the long acquired meaning of article 181 on the sole and simple ground that after the amendment the reason on which the old construction was founded is no longer available We need (1) | India - West Bengal | circa 1952 |
|
||||
(1948) 52 CWN 64 |
|
India | circa 1948 |
|
|||
[1897] AC 22 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1897 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
v Kalyanaswamy (D) by LRS v l Bakthavatsalam (D) THR LRS | [2020] INSC 441 | Supreme Court of India | India | 17 Jul 2020 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Surya Prakash Rastogi v Arun Kumar Singhal & Others - SECOND APPEAL | [2007] INUPHC 15587 | High Court of Judicature at Allahabad | India | 14 Sep 2007 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Surya Prakash Rastogi v Arun Kumar Singhal & Others - SECOND APPEAL | [2007] INAHHC 15587 | Allahbad High Court | India - Allahbad | 14 Sep 2007 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Bharti Telenet Ltd v Union of India | [2005] INSC 208 | Supreme Court of India | India | 31 Mar 2005 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Mohd Usman Military Contractor, Jhansi v Union of India, Ministry of Defence |
[1968] INSC 230; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 26 Sep 1968 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Prativa Bose v Kumar Rupendra Deb Raikat |
[1963] INSC 147; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 10 May 1963 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos & Anr v the Most Rev Mar Poulose Athanasius |
[1954] INSC 70; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 21 May 1954 | LIIofIndia |
|