|
[1982] SC 887
|
[1982] SC 887
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1982
|
|
|
 6
|
|
Nargunt Lutchmedavanah v Vengama Naidoo
|
9 Moore Ind App 66
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Nagesh Bisto Desai v Khando Tirmal Desai
|
[1982] INSC 28; 1982 1 SCALE 418; 1982 2 SCC 79; 1982 3 SCR 341; AIR 1982 SC 887
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
2 Mar 1982
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
5
|
|
[1919] PC 100
|
[1919] PC 100
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
3
|
|
State Government In 'relation to properties which have not become so vested in the Government the Madras impartible Estates Act, 1904 continues to be in force Since the Abolition Act did not affect the plaint properties these have continued to be what they were at the time of incorporation with the Zamindari, namely the properties retain their impartible character The principle cossante ratione legis- 89 cessat ipsa lex has no application in the present case for many times custom outlives the condition of things which give it birth The junior members of a joint family in the case of ancient impartible joint family estate take no right in the property by birth and, therefore, have; no right of partition having regard to the nature, of the estate which is impartible [102 D-H, 103 H, 104 E-F] Rai Kishore Singh v Mst Gahanabai
|
AIR 1919 PC 100
|
Privy Council
|
India
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
2
|
|
2 SCR 280
|
2 SCR 280
|
|
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
2
|
|
Bhaiya Ramanuj Pratap Deo v Lalu Maheshanuj Pratap Deo
|
[1981] INSC 149; [1982] 1 SCR 417; 1981 3 SCALE 1425; AIR 1981 SC 1937
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
26 Aug 1981
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
1
|
|
A] Gopala Krishna v Sarvarna Krishna
|
[1955] AWR 590
|
|
India - Andhra Pradesh
|
circa 1955
|
|
|
1
|
|
[1933] LR Mad 622
|
[1933] LR Mad 622
|
|
India
|
circa 1933
|
|
|
1
|
|
[1889] Exch A-1
|
[1889] Exch A-1
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1889
|
|
|
1
|
