Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Hitachi Ltd v Hoover (Aust) Pty Ltd 2

[1990] APO 20; [1990] AIPC 90-711

IP Australia - Australian Patent Office

Australia

18th July, 1990

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court †	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Du Pont (Australia) Ltd v Newkem Australia Pty Ltd	[1992] APO 3	IP Australia - Australian Patent Office	Australia	7 Feb 1992	AustLII
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated v Allergan, Inc	[1991] APO 13	IP Australia - Australian Patent Office	Australia	16 Apr 1991	AustLII

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name	Provision
PATENTS ACT 1952 (Cth)

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court †	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Vangedal-Nielsen v Smith (Commissioner of Patents)	[1980] FCA 163; 49 FLR 44; (1980) 33 ALR 144; 48 ALT 164; 1A IPR 731; (1980) 3 ALN N21	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	19 Dec 1980	AustLII		243
Du Pont (Australia) Ltd v Newkem Australia Pty Ltd	[1992] APO 3	IP Australia - Australian Patent Office	Australia	7 Feb 1992	AustLII
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated v Allergan, Inc	[1991] APO 13	IP Australia - Australian Patent Office	Australia	16 Apr 1991	AustLII
Re Gould Inc	[1988] APO 44; [1989] AIPC 38,900; 13 IPR 644	IP Australia - Australian Patent Office	Australia	28 Nov 1988	AustLII		18
Kimberly-Clark Ltd v Commissioner of Patents (No 2)	13 IPR 551			circa 1991	LexisNexis AU		19

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback