LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

"The De-Capitation Of a Discipline, Or How Legal Theory Lost Its Head"    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text †		Citation Index
"Power of the Muldarbi, the Road to Its Demise"	(1998) 11 Australian Feminist Law Journal 28	Australian Feminist Law Journal	Australia	circa 1998	HeinOnline		4
"Catharine MacKinnon: Toward a Feminist Theory of the State"	(1997) 9 Australian Feminist Law Journal 45	Australian Feminist Law Journal	Australia	circa 1997	HeinOnline		1
"Indigenous Peoples' Law-Ways: Survival against the Colonial State"	(1997) 8 Australian Feminist Law Journal 39	Australian Feminist Law Journal	Australia	circa 1997	HeinOnline		9
"Aboriginal women and the white lies of the feminist movement: implications for Aboriginal women in rights discourse"	(1993) 1 Australian Feminist Law Journal 27	Australian Feminist Law Journal	Australia	circa 1993	HeinOnline		6
"s Legacy: Living with the Case Method"	(1991) 36 Villanova Law Review 517	Villanova Law Review	United States	circa 1991	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		4
"Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory"	(1990) 42 Stanford Law Review 581	Stanford Law Review	United States	circa 1990	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		27
"Law As Interpretation"	[1982] Texas Law Review 527	Texas Law Review	United States	circa 1982	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"Positivism and Fidelity to Law--A Reply to Professor Hart"	(1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 630	Harvard Law Review	United States	circa 1958	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		41
"Some Realism About Realism--Responding to Dean Pound"	(1931) 44 Harvard Law Review 1222	Harvard Law Review	United States	circa 1931	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		8
"Critical Legal Studies: A Political History"	(1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 515	Yale Law Journal	United States	circa 1991	HeinOnline / Westlaw		1
"Methods of Legal Education"	(1892) 1 Yale Law Journal 143	Yale Law Journal	United States	circa 1892	HeinOnline / Westlaw		1
Southern Pacific Co v Jensen	244 US 206; 244 US 205; 61 L Ed 1086; 37 SCt 524; 61 L Ed 2d 1086	United States Supreme Court	United States	28 Feb 1916	WorldLII		320