LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite

Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Interpretación prejudicial de los art culos 82 literal d), 146 y 147 de la Decisión 344 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, solicitada por el Consejo de Estado de la República de Colombia, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Primera. Interpretación de oficio del art culo 81 de la misma Decisión. Actor: BANCO TEQUENDAMA S.A. Marca: "CUENTA BINACIONAL" (PROCESO Nº 84-IP-2002)   flag 

[2002] ACCJ 92
Court of Justice of the Andean Community
International
10th October, 2002

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name †  Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
1 Equitable Lawyer 3 1 Equitable Lawyer 3 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1
3 Equitable Lawyer 12 3 Equitable Lawyer 12 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2
5 Equitable Lawyer 31 5 Equitable Lawyer 31 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2
6 Equitable Lawyer 31 6 Equitable Lawyer 31 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback