LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy as an Alternative to Litigation    

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
"The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Process and the Appearance of Partiality"	(2002) 19 Journal of International Arbitration 33	Journal of International Arbitration	United States	circa 2002			1
"A Proposal for an Appellate Panel for the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy"	(2001) 18 Journal of International Arbitration 131	Journal of International Arbitration	United States	circa 2001			1
"Squatters in Cyberspace: Netreprenuers or Piratesdoctcom"	(2000-2001) 11 Journal of Law and Information Science 254	Journal of Law and Information Science	Australia	circa 2001	HeinOnline		1
"The Udrp v Traditional Litigation: May The Best Process Win"	(2001) 20 St Louis University Public Law Review 379	St. Louis University Public Law Review	United States	circa 2001			1
"ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy in Action"	(2001) 16 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 229	Berkeley Technology Law Journal	United States	circa 2001	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		2
"Trade Marks and Domain Names"	[2001] CyberLRes 4	Cyberspace Law Resources (AustLII)	Australia	circa 2001	AustLII		2
"The Best Laid Plans: How Unrestrained Arbitration Decisions Have Corrupted the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy"	(2001) 53 Federal Communications Law Journal 509	Federal Communications Law Journal	United States	circa 2001	HeinOnline / Westlaw		2
"Berkeley Technology Law Journal Annual Review of Law and Technology I Intellectual Property; C Trademark ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy"	(2000) 15 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 289	Berkeley Technology Law Journal	United States	circa 2000	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		2
"Effective and Complementary Solutions to Domain Name Disputes: Icann's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy and the Federal Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act of 1999"	(2000) 76 Notre Dame Law Review 209	Notre Dame Law Review	United States	circa 2000	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		2
"Specific remedies for cybersquatting: Part 2"	(2000) 3 Internet Law Bulletin 65	Internet Law Bulletin	Australia	circa 2000			1
"Specific remedies for cybersquatting: Part 1"	(2000) 3 Internet Law Bulletin 49	Internet Law Bulletin	Australia	circa 2000			1
"The Development of Arbitration in the Resolution of Internet Domain Name Disputes"	(2000) 7 Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 2	Richmond Journal of Law & Technology	United States	circa 2000	LexisNexis		2
"Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route around the APA and the Constitution"	(2000) 50 Duke Law Journal 17	Duke Law Journal	United States	circa 2000	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		7
"The New New Thing: Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers"	(2000) 17 Journal of International Arbitration 115	Journal of International Arbitration	United States	circa 2000			1
"Law of trade marks and domain names: Part 2"	(1999) 2 Internet Law Bulletin 17	Internet Law Bulletin	Australia	circa 1999			1
"Law of trade marks and domain names: Part 1"	(1999) 2 Internet Law Bulletin 1	Internet Law Bulletin	Australia	circa 1999			2
"Trade marks as domain names : an Australian experience"	(1999) 3 Macarthur Law Review 43	Macarthur Law Review	Australia	circa 1999	AustLII		2
Panavision Int'l, LP v Toeppen	141 F3d 1316; 46 USPQ2d 1511	United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit	United States	17 Apr 1998	WorldLII		73
[1988] FSR 265	[1988] FSR 265		United Kingdom	circa 1988			1
Intermatic v Toeppen	947 FSupp 1227; (1233) 40 USPQ2d 1412		United States	circa 2000	Westlaw		21
21 Business Review Weekly 96	21 Business Review Weekly 96	Business Review Weekly	Australia	circa 2000			1
Lanham Act	15 USC 1125; [1982] SEC 45	United States Code	United States	circa 2000	LII (Cornell)		424