Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Interpretación prejudicial de los art culos 81 y 82 de la Decisión 344; y, 134 y 135 de la Decisión 486 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, solicitada por el Consejo de Estado de la República de Colombia, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Primera. Interpretación de oficio de la disposición transitoria primera de la Decisión 486. Actor: BAVARIA S.A. Marca: "VITAFRUT" (PROCESO Nº 3-IP-2003)

Court of Justice of the Andean Community

International

26th February, 2003

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name †	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
1 Equitable Lawyer 1�	1 Equitable Lawyer 1�	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom
4 Equitable Lawyer 28	4 Equitable Lawyer 28	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom				1
6 Equitable Lawyer 27	6 Equitable Lawyer 27	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom				2
7 Equitable Lawyer 28	7 Equitable Lawyer 28	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom				3

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback