LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite

Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Interpretación Prejudicial del art culo 27 de la Decisión 344 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, requerida por el Consejo de Estado de la República de Colombia. Interpretación de oficio del art culo 144 de la misma Decisión. Actor: MAX MARVIN ABADI HARARI. Patente: "CONDON Y SISTEMA DE COLOCACION" (PROCESO Nº 41-IP-2003)   flag 

[2003] ACCJ 48
Court of Justice of the Andean Community
International
21st May, 2003

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction †  Date Full Text Citation Index
[1995] Equitable Lawyer 27 [1995] Equitable Lawyer 27 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom circa 1995 flag 1
4 Equitable Lawyer 24 4 Equitable Lawyer 24 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1
5 Equitable Lawyer 31 5 Equitable Lawyer 31 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2
1 Equitable Lawyer 23 1 Equitable Lawyer 23 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2
7 Equitable Lawyer 16 7 Equitable Lawyer 16 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback